Academic journal article Journal of Accountancy
Looking through the QSub Election
The Tax Court denied a taxpayer's claim that the interest expense deduction for IRC [section] 265 qualified tax-exempt obligations (QTEOs) held by a qualified subchapter 5 subsidiary (QSub) bank is exempt from IRC [section] 291(a)(3) financial institution preference item limitations.
Petitioners Jerome and Doris Vainisi together owned 100% of an S corporation that in turn owned 100% of a QSub. The QSub itself qualified as an IRC [section] 581 bank. The 2003 and 2004 S corporation tax returns listed deductions for the full amount of the interest expense incurred on various QTEOs held by the QSub. The IRS issued deficiency notices indicating that the interest expense deductions were subject to a 20% reduction for financial institution preference items under IRC [section] 291(a)(3). According to the IRS, the interest expense reduction was to be applied to the QSub, which held the QTEOs.
Under IRC [section] 1361(b)(3)(A), when a QSub election is made, the S corporation's subsidiary ceases to exist as a separate corporation, and all of its assets, liabilities, credits and items of income and deductions are treated as those of the parent S corporation. This is commonly known as the disregarded entity rule.
The petitioners claimed that under IRC [section] 1363(b)(4), section 291 applies to an S corporation's taxable income computation only if the S corporation was a C corporation for any of the three immediately preceding taxable years. The parent S corporation had elected subchapter S status on Jan. 1, 1997. Therefore, disregarding the QSub under section 1361 (b)(3)(A), the taxpayers ignored the section 291(a)(3) interest expense reduction and included the full deduction for interest expense on the QSub's QTEOs in the S corporation's taxable income calculation. …