Academic journal article Academy of Educational Leadership Journal

Cognition & Risk Perception in Business Environmental Sustainability Education

Academic journal article Academy of Educational Leadership Journal

Cognition & Risk Perception in Business Environmental Sustainability Education

Article excerpt

"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them" Albert Einstein

"All real change is grounded in new ways of thinking and perceiving.... Different ways of thinking lead to different ways of acting" Peter Senge

INTRODUCTION

This monograph forwards a conceptual framework useful in analyzing the potential impact of various cognitive heuristics on environmental risk and opportunity assessment within the business context. Following articulation of some of the key elements in this framework, the model is then used to develop educational strategies designed help students address some of the challenges of corporate environmental responsibility. These educational approaches have specific relevance in courses where the skills of ethical discernment and associated critical thinking are paramount. Relevant courses might include business ethics, corporate social responsibility (CSR), business in society or any course in a functional area addressing ethics and CSR.

This analysis is predicated upon the following premises and associated logic:

1. Present and future organizational leaders need to accurately perceive emerging global realities and make decisions based upon a sound understanding of the risks and opportunities relevant to their operating environment. One important area of strategic risk and opportunity grows out of the ubiquitous environmental impacts of our increasingly industrialized civilization. The term corporate environmental responsibility will be used to delineate those responsibilities that a firm has in relation to potentially negative externalities produced by the organization's production processes.

2. The ability of decision makers to perceive and respond to challenges of corporate environmental responsibility ultimately depends upon the quality of individual human judgment and associated cognitive information processing. These mental processes are in turn significantly influenced by predictable cognitive biases and potentially dysfunctional mental shortcuts (cognitive heuristics) that may cause some decision makers to ignore important risks and/or fail to recognize emergent strategic opportunity (Messick and Bazerman, 1996). These judgmental dynamics will be described as a form of bounded rationality, a term more fully explored in subsequent sections.

3. Innovative educational strategies can be deployed based upon an understanding of the dynamics of bounded rationality and associated systematic cognitive bias. These strategies can be used by business educators to improve veridical problem detection and combat dangerous denial and or discounting of potentially calamitous environmental problems.

WHY SHOULD BUSINESS SCHOOLS CARE ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES?

Objective analysis of the ecosphere's vital signs reveals a steady deterioration in biodiversity and other indicators of global ecological health ((Cristol, 2003);(Christen, 2001); (Galusky, 2000); (Suzuki, 2002)). In addition, virtually all of the major scientific learned societies (e.g. National Academies of Science, European Academy of Sciences and Arts, International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Science etc.) and the U.N Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change formally state that global climate change is real and posit its primarily anthropocentric origins with a 95% confidence interval.

Even if one is a climate change skeptic, one is still faced with ample evidence of an increasingly unhealthy ecosphere. According to the recently released Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report, a 5 year UN sponsored study by 1700 of the world's leading environmental experts: "Although evidence remains incomplete, there is enough for the experts to warn that the ongoing degradation of 15 of the 24 ecosystem services examined is increasing the likelihood of potentially abrupt changes that will seriously affect human well-being. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.