Academic journal article British Journal of Community Justice

Race Relations in Prison: Managing Performance and Developing Engagement

Academic journal article British Journal of Community Justice

Race Relations in Prison: Managing Performance and Developing Engagement

Article excerpt


This paper has its origins in our attempts to understand and respond to the underrepresentation of BME sex offenders on the Prison Service of England and Wales' sex offender treatment programme (SOTP) (Cowburn and Lavis et al 2008a, 2008b). However, it is also influenced by our recent experience of undertaking research funded by the Economic and Social Research Council which sought to explore how issues of diversity within the prisoner population are responded to in HMP Wakefield (1). In carrying out that research we became sensitised to the existence of parallel, yet often conflicting, 'stories' of prison performance. Such conflicts generate difficulties for researchers in accounting for practices, particularly where standardised [quantitative] measures of performance tell a different story than first hand observation and the told experience of staff and prisoners. This tension is consistent with Cheliotis and Liebling's (2006) argument that performance measures count but do not account for issues related to race relations in prison. Using the case study of accredited offending behaviour related programmes in prison we explore what inhibits and what facilitates the participation of Black and Minority Ethnic prisoners in prison life. These programmes are a key element in mapping prisoners' sentence plans and in preparing them for living without committing offences when released from prison; as such involvement with these programmes would appear to be essential for all prisoners. This paper highlights the evidence of ethnic minority non-participation in accredited offending behaviour programmes. It considers ways of understanding this phenomenon that includes theorising the development and enactment of positive identities.

In this paper we use the term 'BME' to refer to Black and Asian minority ethnic prisoners. This term is used in the Impact assessments of Prison functions in England and Wales (H. M. Prison Service, 2007a, 2007b, 2007c; 2008a, 2008b, 2008c). Aspinall (2002: 803-805) points to the limitations of what he calls 'pan-ethnic' terms. Moreover, the Prison Service recognises that the term has limited utility, particularly in distinguishing particular ethnic groups; thus from the second quarter of 2008 it introduced a new database (SMART II) which enables more sophisticated analysis of ethnic groupings (it uses six categories--Asian, Black, Mixed, Other, White British and White Other). Presumably future Impact assessments will reflect this complexity. However, the focus of this paper is 'race relations' which are largely predicated on skin colour rather than detailed ethnic differences, so the use of pan-ethnic terminology is appropriate. Where we use the terms "Black" and "White" to denote race (as defined only by skin colour) we use capital letters to denote the ideological constructs implicit in the terms, however where cited sources use the terms we reproduce the original typographic case.

The paper first outlines how performance in relation to 'race relations' is managed in the prisons of England and Wales. It then presents demographic data related to the ethnic makeup of the national prison population and the non-participation of BME prisoners in Offending Behaviour programmes. It moves on to develop an understanding of BME prisoner (non) participation in offending behaviour programmes, and concludes with an exploration of how prisons may move from monitoring discrimination to encouraging participation.

Performance management in the Prisons of England and Wales: Race Relations

Performance information shows how well an organisation is performing against its stated objectives. Knowing how well the organisation is currently doing is essential in developing strategy and policies to meet the organisation's aims. (H.M. Treasury 2001: cited in Liebling & Arnold 2005:57)

The information related to the performance of the Prison Service of England and Wales is prescribed by a 'framework of targets or standards' (Liebling and Arnold 2005: 56-57). …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.