Academic journal article Educational Technology & Society

The Effects of the E-Book System with the Reading Guidance and the Annotation Map on the Reading Performance of College Students

Academic journal article Educational Technology & Society

The Effects of the E-Book System with the Reading Guidance and the Annotation Map on the Reading Performance of College Students

Article excerpt

Introduction

Reading is a vital skill. Students with proficient reading skills have the potential to become enhanced self-regulated learners and, thus, demonstrate high academic achievement. However, most students are not proficient in reading. Many students even lack the basic reading skills necessary to perform future job-related tasks (Artis, 2008), which will greatly affect their future study and work.

Several reading-study strategy systems provide clear guidelines to help students learn and practise techniques that imitate the behaviors of highly proficient readers (e.g., SQ3R, 3R, and KWL; Al-Khateeb & Idrees, 2010; Artis, 2008; McDaniel, Howard, & Einstein, 2009; Robinson, 1970). SQ3R, which consists of five steps (surveying, questioning, reading, reciting, and reviewing), is the most popular reading-study system and was primarily designed for expository text, particularly academic textbooks.

Although SQ3R is a purposeful and meaningful reading method in which students practise different reading strategies, it is cumbersome for novice learners to learn and use (Flippo & Caverly, 2000; Huber, 2004). The SQ3R process is complex, and the knowledge constructed during this process is comprehensive and varied. Novice learners must expend more cognitive and behavioral effort in operating and managing the process and knowledge before they become experienced. Their effort may impede reading comprehension when learners are unfamiliar with this method. This impediment may lower their motivation for using and practising this strategy (Artis, 2008).

Because the SQ3R process is complex, novice learners must use more cognitive resources to remember the SQ3R steps, when to use these steps, what purpose each step has, and how to perform each step. Although training and practice can facilitate the learning process, it consumes time and effort. Teachers typically address this method for a brief period and ask students to use it by themselves after class.

The learning products that are constructed and acquired during the SQ3R process are comprehensive and varied: section titles, keywords, an overview in the surveying step, questions in the questioning step, comments and crucial points in the reading step, and summaries in the reciting step. The relationship among the products forms a hierarchical structure. For example, when creating a question for a section title, several pieces of highlighted text and comments are generated to answer the question or explain a keyword, and a summary is written for the section. The hierarchical structure is useful for remembering and reviewing the learning products. However, they are distributed among different pages, and students have difficulty perceiving and remembering the structure and relationship.

This study designed an e-book reader that integrates SQ3R reading strategies with two scaffolding tools, a reading guidance module, and an annotation map, to solve the previously mentioned problems. The reading guidance module reminds readers of the purpose and task of each SQ3R step and provides examples for imitation. The annotation map, which integrates the annotations distributed among different pages into a hierarchical structure, is designed to support reading, reviewing, and navigating. In addition, we conducted an experiment to determine the effect of this e-book reader on the reading behavior and performance of readers.

Related works

Reading strategies and SQ3R

Reading strategies, which play a vital role in reading comprehension, have been recognized as effective approaches in increasing reading comprehension (Huang, Chern, & Lin, 2009). Successful readers apply several reading strategies for reading comprehension, such as recognizing text structure, posing questions, reflecting on behavior or the process, monitoring comprehension, organizing graphs, taking notes, and rereading (Sung, Chang, & Huang, 2008; Yang, 2006). …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.