Academic journal article Studies in the Novel

Never Great, Only Popular: Mary Elizabeth Braddon's the Doctor's Wife and the Literary Marketplace

Academic journal article Studies in the Novel

Never Great, Only Popular: Mary Elizabeth Braddon's the Doctor's Wife and the Literary Marketplace

Article excerpt

From the time of its initial publication, Mary Elizabeth Braddon's 1864 novel The Doctor's Wife (1) has most frequently been read in relation to Gustave Flaubert's Madame Bovary (1856), the plot of which Braddon borrowed for her first serious foray into realist fiction. In terms of style, character, and, for the most part, plot, The Doctor's Wife presents an ostensible departure from the sensation fiction on which Braddon had built her reputation, yet as the Pall Mall Gazette recognized in an 1865 review, the tie to Madame Bovary rather cleverly positioned the novel for success in the literary marketplace:

   [A] good stroke of business may sometimes be done by taking a
   clever but improper French novel, omitting the improper incidents
   or transforming them when they are not hopelessly bad into proper
   ones, and giving the residuum to the world as an entirely original
   story. The great advantage of this literary and commercial
   operation ... lies in the fact that in England the improper
   original, whatever scandal may say to the contrary, is tolerably
   sure not to have been read by ladies; and they are the great
   supporters of novel literature. (4)

In his analysis of the commercially-driven motives he assumes were behind Braddon's choice to adapt Flaubert's novel, this reviewer conflates Braddon with Sigismund Smith, her sensation novelist alter-ego within The Doctor's Wife; to Smith, the reviewer attributes the ingenious plan to make money by transforming Flaubert's story for an English audience, while to Braddon, he assigns blame for presenting a corrupting influence to impressionable young ladies through a novel that is "superficially 'proper'" but "altogether unsound" (4). The business of novel-writing, the destructive models of behavior fiction provided for women readers, and Braddon's self-representation through Smith are indeed central concerns in The Doctor's Wife, yet these themes work together to quite different ends than the Pall Mall Gazette's reviewer supposes.

Braddon's novel certainly resembles Madame Bovary in its use of a romantic heroine who marries a boring country doctor and then engages in an extramarital relationship (albeit an innocent one in Braddon's version of the story) to experience some of the romance she desires in her life, but the two novels are quite different beyond this shared plotline. Reading novels initially feeds Emma Bovary's dreams of a luxurious lifestyle, yet Flaubert shows little interest in chronicling the details of what Emma reads. (2) The Doctor's Wife, on the other hand, is concerned with the specifics of the heroine's reading as well as the business of novel-writing. Unlike Flaubert, Braddon includes references to specific character names and plot points when describing Isabel Gilbert's reading, and she could safely assume that her readers would understand these allusions because she cites only famous, highly-respected authors--Byron, Shelley, Scott, Dickens, Thackeray, Bulwer-Lytton, Tennyson, and Charlotte Bronte are featured most prominently. Braddon moves even farther away from Madame Bovary through her inclusion of Sigismund Smith, who allows her to engage quite pointedly in the heated debate over sensation fiction at the center of which she found herself because of her wildly successful novels.

Braddon's contemporaries were confused by her overt references to sensation fiction in The Doctor's Wife. The Bristol Mercury (in a favorable 1864 review) misinterprets Braddon's characterization of Smith as well as the types of works her heroine reads:

   To show how much she despises the fame of a mere 'sensation'
   writer, as against the reputation of an author who regards true
   artistic development, she introduces, as one of the characters of
   the book before us, Sigismund Smith, a shining light of that
   'raw-head and blood-bones' kind of literature which figures in
   numerous penny publications, and no small pains are taken to hold
   up the class he represents to ridicule. … 
Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.