Academic journal article The Review of Metaphysics

The Philosophical Review: Vol. 124, No. 3, July 2015

Academic journal article The Review of Metaphysics

The Philosophical Review: Vol. 124, No. 3, July 2015

Article excerpt

Can the Classical Logician Avoid the Revenge Paradoxes? ANDREW BACON

Most work on the semantic paradoxes within classical logic has centered around what this essay calls "linguistic" accounts of the paradoxes: they attribute to sentences or utterances of sentences some property that is supposed to explain their paradoxical or nonparadoxical status. "No proposition" views are paradigm examples of linguistic theories, although practically all accounts of the paradoxes subscribe to some kind of linguistic theory. This essay shows that linguistic accounts of the paradoxes endorsing classical logic are subject to a particularly acute form of the revenge paradox: that there is no exhaustive classification of sentences into "good" and "bad" such that the T-schema holds when restricted to the "good" sentences unless it is also possible to prove some "bad" sentences. The foundations for an alternative classical nonlinguistic approach that is not subject to the same kinds of problems is outlined. Although revenge paradoxes of different strengths can be formulated, they are found to be indeterminate at higher orders and not inconsistent.

Is Memory Merely Testimony from One's Former Self? DAVID JAMES BARNETT

A natural view of testimony holds that a source's statements provide one with evidence about what the source believes, which in turn provides one with evidence about what is true. But some theorists have gone further and developed a broadly analogous view of memory. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.