Academic journal article Adolescence

Ecological Factors Associated with Adolescent Pregnancy: A Review of the Literature

Academic journal article Adolescence

Ecological Factors Associated with Adolescent Pregnancy: A Review of the Literature

Article excerpt


Adolescent pregnancy, the disproportionate number of births to unmarried adolescents, the potential disadvantages for both mothers and their children, and the commensurate costs to society have received the attention of researchers in a variety of disciplines. This article reviews and synthesizes the disparate literature on psychosocial factors associated with adolescent pregnancy using Bronfenbrenner's ecological model. Social influences within the macrosystem, mesosystem, and microsystem are examined. Policy and service delivery recommendations are offered.

Adolescents account for a third of all out-of-wedlock births per year nationwide (United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1995). Associated problems include the increased likelihood of deleterious consequences for both adolescent mothers and their children (e.g., McAnarney & Hendee, 1989) and the cost for society as a whole (Burt, 1986). Reflecting public concern, research on adolescent pregnancy prevention has been ongoing since the 1970s (see Chilman, 1980; PhippsYonas, 1980; Urberg, 1982, for reviews) across a variety of disciplines: child development, psychology, social work, sociology, family science, nursing, and medicine. Synthesizing these disparate approaches is a difficult task (Elster, McAnarney, & Lamb, 1983). However, Bronfenbrenner's (1979) ecological model can be employed to organize the salient contributing factors in adolescent pregnancy. Support for an ecological perspective has been provided indirectly in the early reviews of the literature (Chilman, 1980; Phipps-Yonas, 1980 ; Urberg, 1982) and by more recent multivariate analyses.

Adapted from the physical sciences to explain human behavior, "Bronfenbrenner's (1979) ecological model of human development... conceptualizes ecological space as operating on different levels of systems, each of which is incorporated within the next" (Franklin, 1988, p. 340). At the most basic interactional level is the microsystem, which is the pattern of activities, roles, and interpersonal relations experienced by the individual in a given setting. The mesosystem involves interactions among settings. The next level, the exosystem, includes settings that affect the individual but with which the individual does not interact directly (exosystem variables are not covered here, since there are so many other variables that have a more direct impact on adolescents). The macrosystem includes the cultural variables that influence the individual.

Bronfenbrenner's conceptualization of ecological systems has been used in theoretical formulations, as well as employed in empirical research. Variables have often been chosen to represent system levels depending on the social phenomenon under study, making it difficult to "test" the ecological model. Nevertheless, the model can be seen as a way to organize factors associated with complex social problems so that knowledge building can occur and intervention can be implemented at the appropriate system level.

In the present article, Bronfenbrenner's definitions and relevant literature guided decisions about the psychosocial variables belonging to each system. Studies involving a range of ecological factors were included, even those not typically identified with the ecological systems framework. Studies using a cognitive framework, in which adolescent sexual behavior is viewed from a decision-making perspective, were excluded (e.g., Jorgensen & Adams, 1988; Keith, McCreary, Collins, Smith, & Bernstein, 1991; Marsiglio, 1985; Nathanson & Becker, 1983; Rogel, Zuehlke, Peterson, Tobin-Richards, & Shelton, 1980; Urberg, 1982; White, 1984). Because historical context is an element of the macrosystem, studies published since 1980 were reviewed. Although a case could be built for using data on parental communication to determine which teens are likely to get pregnant, this was seen as an overly specific focus, and more general family functioning was included. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.