Criticism has been directed toward alcohol advertising, particularly regarding the use of image (lifestyle) advertising, and its potential influence on teenage alcohol consumption. This study sought to determine if adolescents who drink, or intend to drink alcohol at some future time, find image advertisements for alcohol more appealing than product advertisements. The results indicated that image advertising was preferred to product advertising, particularly by younger adolescents. Evidence of an association between preference for image advertisements and intent to drink in the future was found. Policy implications of the findings are discussed.
The controversy over the impact of alcohol advertising on alcohol consumption and attitudes about drinkers and drinking continues to mount. These debates have led to actual bans on alcohol advertising in some countries (Addiction Research Foundation, 1981) as well as to proposed legislation banning alcohol advertisements in others (Canadian Radio-Television Commission, 1990). Many proposals designed to minimize the impact of alcohol advertising have been put forth by legislators in the United States, with the requirement to place warnings in all forms of alcohol advertising receiving the most attention. Though the outcry directed at alcohol advertisers usually is concerned with the persuasive capabilities of advertising, more focused criticisms include the alleged targeting of underage drinkers through the use of appealing image advertising. Image advertising focuses on the lifestyle of the user of the product rather than on the intrinsic value of the product itself (Snyder & DeBono, 1985). The image adverti sement, with varying degrees of subtlety, suggests that the depicted lifestyles can be attained by use of the product. Image advertisements rarely make any explicit mention of product quality. In contrast, product advertisements focus on claims about the merit of the product (e.g., the taste is delicious or product performance is excellent).
A common response from the alcohol industry to criticisms of their advertising is that the focus of alcohol advertising is to encourage existing drinkers to maintain their brand preference, or to switch brands, and that it is not intended to attract new customers (Waterson, 1989; Mosher & Wallack, 1981). Further, alcohol industry spokespersons point out that research has never proven a causative link between advertising and consumption. The industry advocates continued self-regulation through the Advertising Standards Authority and controls emanating from the Independent Broadcasting Authority (Circus, 1989). In addition, the alcohol industry believes that the proposed requirement of warnings in alcohol advertisements is an infringement of their First Amendment rights (Dunn, 1991).
The majority of studies investigating the impact of alcohol advertising on consumption are econometric. Generally, variables such as advertising expenditures are manipulated in regression models to determine the impact on sales (Duffy, 1981; Ogborne & Smart, 1980; Bourgeois & Barnes, 1979). The results of these studies have been inconclusive and equivocal (Aitken et al., 1988; Comstogk, 1976). One of the limitations in using regression analyses of sales as a function of other variables is that sales analyses cannot reflect consumption by minors--the very audience that critics claim to be most vulnerable to alcohol advertising--since minors are not included in alcohol sales figures. The same limitation holds true in empirical and quasi experiments. Since these studies rely on observed purchasing behavior or consumption, it is not ethically or legally possible to measure the impact of advertising on adolescent consumption in this way.
Although self-reports of attitudes and behaviors are often criticized as not verifiable and therefore potentially unreliable, this methodology is one of the few viable alternatives for studying the impact of alcohol advertising on underage youth. …