Academic journal article Defense Counsel Journal

Reviewing the Law Reviews

Academic journal article Defense Counsel Journal

Reviewing the Law Reviews

Article excerpt

This is a selective bibliography of current law review literature of interest to defense counsel. Main articles are identified by naming the author or authors. The designations "Note," "Comment," "Case Note," etc. are as listed in the publication, with the authorship, if given, shown in parentheses. Symposiums generally are shown by title.

U.S. and International


Lewis R. Hagood, Claims of Mental and Emotional Damages in Employment Discrimination Cases. 29 N.C. CENT. L.J. 14 (1997-98). North Carolina Central Law Journal, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC 27707.

Lewis Yelin (Note), Burford Abstention in Actions for Damages. 99 COLUM. L. REV. 1871 (1999). Columbia Law Review, 435 W. 116th St., New York, NY 10027.

Heather K. McShain (Note), Still Alive: Antitrust Injury Remains a Part of the Standing Inquiry under Sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act Despite Three Recent Appellate Court Decisions. 75 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 761 (1999). Notre Dame Law Review, P.O. Box 988, Notre Dame, IN 46556.

Jason Micah Ross (Note), "Baseball Litigation": A New Calculus for Awarding Damages in Tort Trials. 78 TEX. L. REV. 439 (1999). Texas Law Review, 727 E. 26th St., Austin, TX 78705.


Harvey Brown, Eight Gates for Expert Witnesses. 36 HOUS. L. REV. 743 (1999).

Harvey Brown, Procedural Issues under Daubert. 36 HOUS. L. REV. 1133 (1999). Houston Law Review, Room 25, University of Houston Law Center, University Park, Houston, TX 77204-6370.

Shawn Pompian (Note), Is the Statute of Frauds Ready for Electronic Contracting? 85 VA. L. REV. 1447 (1999). Virginia Law Review, University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, VA 22901.

Deana A. Pollard, Unconscious Bias and Self-critical Analysis: The Case for a Qualified Evidentiary Equal Employment Opportunity Privilege. 74 WASH L. REV. 913 (1999). Washington Law Review, Condon Hall JB-20, 1100 N.E. Campus Parkway, Seattle, WA 98105.

Paul R. Rice, Attorney-client Privilege: Continuing Confusion about Attorney Communications, Drafts, Pre-existing Documents, and the Source of the Facts Communicated. 48 AM. U. L. REV. 967 (1999). American University Law Review, 4400 Massachusetts Ave. N.W., Washington, DC 20016.

Charles C. Warner, Motions in Limine in Employment Discrimination Litigation. 29 U. MEM L. REV.. 823 1999). University of Memphis Law Review, Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law, Memphis, TN 38152.

Steven Zeidman, Who Needs an Evidence Code? The New York Court of Appeals' Radical Re-evaluation of Hearsay. 21 CARDOZO L. REV. 211 (1999). Cardozo Law Review, 55 Fifth Ave., New York, NY 10003-4391.

Karen D. Butera, Seeing Is Believing: A Practitioner's Guide to the Admissibility of Demonstrative Computer Evidence. 46 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 511 (1998). Cleveland State Law Review, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, OH 44115.

Joshua M. Masur (Comment), Safety in Numbers: Revisiting the Risks to Client Confidences and Attorney-client Privilege Posed by Internet Electronic Mail. 14 BERKELEY TECH. L.J. 1117 (1999). Berkeley Technology Law Journal, University of California Press Periodicals Dep't, 2120 Berkeley Way, Berkeley, A 94720.


Joseph P. Monteleone & Emy Poulad Grotell, Coverage for Employment Practices Liability under Various Policies: Commercial General Liability, Homeowners', Umbrella Workers' Compensation, and Directors' and Officers' Liability Policies. 21 NEW ENG. L. REV. 249.

Jeffrey W. Stempel, Judge-made Insurance That Was Not on the Menu: Schmidt v. Smith and the Confluence of Text, Expectation, and Public Policy in the Realm of Employment Practices Liability. 21 NEW ENG. L. REV. 283 (1999).

Francis J. Mootz III, Insuring Employer Liability for Hostile Work Environment Claims: How Changes in Discrimination Law May Affect the Growing Market for Employment-related Practices Liability Insurance. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.