Academic journal article Journal of Law and Education

When School Management Companies Fail: Righting Educational Wrongs

Academic journal article Journal of Law and Education

When School Management Companies Fail: Righting Educational Wrongs

Article excerpt

INTRODUCTION

Increasing disaffection with American public education has spurred the rise of for-profit school management corporations that are acquiring pieces of the public education pie in two major ways. First, state departments of education or public school districts, acting under various "empowerment acts," contract with them to take over the operation of failing districts, or, second, they either obtain charters to operate public charter schools or subcontract to provide educational services to nonprofit companies that obtain such charters. In both cases, public money supports the privately operated "public" schools and goes into the coffers of the for-profit school management corporations.

Oversight and monitoring the delivery of educational services in school districts handed over to private management companies or in public charter schools operated by such private companies is problematic. Several districts have revoked contracts with school management companies when student scores on standardized tests failed to demonstrate significant improvement over a period of two or three years. "Turning around" a failing school or school district, however, can be a slow process under the best management. Conversely, leaving an ineffective school management company in control for an extended period of time may deprive students of educational opportunities that they cannot recoup.

Merely revoking a contract does not remedy damages incurred under the contract. Although an extensive literature detailing the rise of public charter schools has developed, few commentators helpfully address the possible causes of action or the remedies available to students disadvantaged by attending schools managed by or subcontracted to for-profit school management corporations. Such remedies are the focus of this paper.

Part I reviews the traditional system of public education in the United States, with control of educational decision-making in the hands of the individual states, and discusses the rise of school management corporations and how they acquire control of schools and school districts. Since many state charter school laws grant charters exclusively to nonprofit corporations, Part II examines the differences between nonprofit and for-profit corporations, especially with regard to the fiduciary duties of their managers and the differences in accountability to those who subsidize the companies. A nonprofit school management corporation generally exercises control over a single community school with a specific educational mission; the directors of these nonprofit corporations typically work closely with parents of school students, and are, therefore, more visible and accountable to stakeholders than their counterparts in for-profit companies. For-profit school management corporations generally pursue wider operational scope in order to realize profitability from economies of scale; directors are more autonomous and may even be invisible to stakeholders. Even with nonprofit corporations nominally in control of charter schools, however, the potential for significant abuse still exists when they subcontract educational services to for-profit corporations. Part II also briefly examines the conflict between for-profit school management and the education of students inherent in the shareholder wealth maximization principle of traditional corporate governance, and reviews the failure of "other constituency" statutes to resolve the conflict.

Part III examines indicators of school performance and discusses the standards of accountability available for judging the performance of school management companies. Part III also offers an evaluation of the largest for-profit school management company, Edison Schools, Inc.

Part IV reviews the alternative causes of action suggested by commentators to facilitate redress of educational wrongs to students committed in the charter schools and takeover contexts. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.