Academic journal article The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Constructing Personality Maps, Mapping Personality Constructs: Multidimensional Scaling Recovers the Big Five Factors from Internal and External Structure

Academic journal article The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Constructing Personality Maps, Mapping Personality Constructs: Multidimensional Scaling Recovers the Big Five Factors from Internal and External Structure

Article excerpt

This report examines the structure of similarities underlying the lexicon of personality-trait description, when "similarity" is defined and measured in terms of (a) semantic judgment and (b) covariance in actual use. A lexicon of 60 trait adjectives was examined, using several procedures for collecting semantic judgments. Similarity data of both kinds were analyzed with multidimensional scaling (MDS) to provide a parsimonious representation of underlying structure. The convergence between semantic judgments and covariance within trait-attribution data was substantial; both kinds of data evinced the same structure when collected for subsets of adjectives. Canonical correlation was employed to find the number of dimensions shared across MDS solutions. Interpretation of the results was facilitated by individual-differences MDS, which can select an optimal set of underlying dimensions, and at the same time accommodate the differences between data sets that arise when data-collection procedures differ in the relative emphasis they place upon those dimensions. We interpret the small number and shared nature of the dimensions by arguing that the lexicon's structure relates to trait perception rather than personality structure per se, even when probed with trait-attribution covariance.

Keywords: Big Five, trait perception, internal structure, multidimensional scaling

Este trabajo examina la estructura de las similitudes subyacentes al léxico de la descripción de los rasgos de personalidad, cuando "similitud" se define y se mide en términos de: (a) juicio semántico y (b) covarianza en el uso actual. Se examinó un léxico de 60 adjetivos de rasgos, empleando varios procedimientos para recoger juicios semánticos. Los datos de similitud de ambos tipos se analizaron con escalonamiento multidimensional (EMD) para obtener una representación parsimoniosa de la estructura subyacente. La convergencia entre los juicios semánticos y la covarianza rasgo-datos atribucionales era sustancial; ambos tipos de datos mostraban la misma estructura cuando se recogían para subconjuntos de adjetivos. Se empleó la correlación canónica para encontrar el número de dimensiones compartidas por las soluciones EMD. La EMD de diferencias individuales facilitó la interpretación de los resultados porque puede seleccionar un conjunto óptimo de dimensiones subyacentes y, al mismo tiempo, adaptar las diferencias entre los conjuntos de datos que emergen cuando los procedimientos de recogida de datos difieren con respecto al énfasis relativo que se concede a dichas dimensiones. Nosotros interpretamos el pequeño número y la naturaleza compartida de las dimensiones arguyendo que la estructura del léxico se relaciona más con la percepción de los rasgos que con la estructure de la personalidad en sí, incluso cuando se analiza mediante la covarianza rasgo-atribución.

Palabras clave: Big Five, la percepción de rasgos, la estructura interna, escalonamiento multidimensional

Over the last two or three decades, the relationships and connections among descriptors of personality traits have become a major focus of empirical research, as well as the subject of interest from the theoretical and applied communities. To put it in very broad terms, the hope is that a relatively simple set of variables might hold sway above the plethora of trait-descriptive words, phrases, and sentences. Reduction to these variables would provide the language for an adequate description of an individual's personality structure, accommodate much of the variation between individual structures, and be universal, in the sense that the variables could ideally be translated across languages and cultures without loss of validity.

The structure underlying an inventory of descriptors can be made explicit in a variety of ways. Following Wiggins (1973), it is convenient to distinguish between internal and external structure. The former is evinced when informants treat descriptors as free-floating abstractions, and make judgments about similarities of meaning among them rather than apply them to specific personalities (D'Andrade, 1965). …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.