Academic journal article Southeastern Archaeology

Temporal Trends in Native Ceramic Traditions of the Lower Catawba River Valley

Academic journal article Southeastern Archaeology

Temporal Trends in Native Ceramic Traditions of the Lower Catawba River Valley

Article excerpt

During his 10 years with University of North Carolina's (UNC) Research Laboratories of Anthropology (now Archaeology) (RLA), Bennie C. Keel revolutionized archaeological fieldwork and analysis in North Carolina. His landmark investigations in the southern Appalachians established a regional cultural sequence that remains robustly applicable after 30 years of subsequent research (see Keel 1976). Keel's work on southern Appalachian Middle Woodland cultures and their linkages to the broader "Hopewell Interaction Sphere" phenomenon (see Chapman and Keel 1979) continues to inform research across the Eastern Woodlands.

Less heralded are Keel's short-term forays from the RLA to test or salvage endangered sites throughout the state. Many of these brief, opportunistic investigations yielded discrete bodies of data that have since assumed greater significance within new frameworks of inquiry. Such is the case with Keel's early work at Hardins and BeIk Farm, lower Catawba River Valley sites that documented evidence of fifteenth-century and seventeenth-century occupations, respectively. David Moore (2002) incorporated data from these investigations into his groundbreaking synthesis of Catawba Valley Mississippian, and evidence from BeIk Farm served to link prehistoric and protohistoric era ceramic traditions in the Catawba River Valley with those of presumably Catawban-speaking communities of the early historic era.

The study presented in this article integrates ceramic assemblage information from Keel's work at Hardins and Belk Farm with recently acquired evidence from mid-eighteenth-century Nassaw town, Revolutionary War era Old Town, and Federal period New Town (Davis and Riggs 2004) to track broad patterns of stability and change in native pottery traditions in the lower Catawba River Valley (Figure 1). Inclusion of these eighteenth-century and nineteenth-century samples extends Moore's (2002) analysis of Catawba River Valley ceramics to achieve historical linkage with contemporary Catawba Indian ceramic practice (see Baker 1972; Blumer 2004), thereby addressing Moore's (2002:159) admonition that "clearly, formal comprehensive analysis of pottery from well-documented eighteenth-century Catawba towns will ease the dilemma we currently face in understanding the possible relationship between protohistoric period Catawba valley pottery and the historic period pottery associated with Catawba peoples."

Ceramics of the Late Pre-Contact Era: The Hardins Assemblage

Keel first documented evidence of late Mississippian period occupation in the lower Catawba River Valley at the Hardins site, located along the South Fork of the Catawba River near present-day High Shoals in Gaston County, North Carolina (Keel 1966, 1990). The RLA conducted limited salvage investigations at the site in 1966, following the discovery of a grave at Hardins by soil-borrowing operations for a highway project. Investigators documented two late Mississippian period graves and two contemporaneous pit features before soil borrowing resumed. These contexts yielded 132 ceramic sherds, which Keel (1990:10) characterized as representing "the earlier part of emerging Catawba ceramics," an assertion based primarily on the Hardins pottery's similarity to seventeenth-century wares from BeIk Farm and the location of both Hardins and Belk Farm within the historic Catawba territory. Keel (1990:8-10) describes the "emerging Catawba ceramics" of Hardins sample and BeIk Farm, noting that

during this period a group of ceramics appear in the Catawba River basin that can be traced directly to those made by the historic Catawba Indians.

This pottery is well made, relatively thin, and hard. . . . The paste is generally fine and tempering material tends to be fine sand although crushed quartz occasionally finds use as an aplastic. There is a fairly wide range of forms - open bowls, casuela bowls, collared jars, and pots with slightly constricted orifices. Rim forms are straight with rounded or flattened lips on bowls; however, flaring rims are commonly found on jars and pots. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.