Academic journal article Southeast Asian Affairs

VIETNAM: A Tale of Four Players

Academic journal article Southeast Asian Affairs

VIETNAM: A Tale of Four Players

Article excerpt

Who are the key players of Vietnamese politics? What characterizes its dynamics? What is to be expected of it in the next few years? This essay is an attempt to address the above questions. It suggests that the politics of Vietnam can be imagined as a game between four key players. If the government is defined as the central authoritative locus of politics in a country, then the Vietnamese Government is caught primarily between regime conservatives, modernizers, rent- seekers, and China. Each of these players is a bloc of diverse actors that share an ultimate strategic goal or inclination.

The distinction of the three Vietnamese blocs deserves further explanation. The criterion for sorting someone to a bloc is the person's priority or inclination when it comes to fundamental issues such as ideology (whether the country should be open or closed to liberal ideas from the West) and the Communist Party's relation to the nation (whether the party is superior or inferior to the nation). The conservative is one who is more likely to opt for a "closed door" and "party first" policy, the modernizer for openness and the whole-nation's perspective, and the rent-seeker for whatever that brings him or her most money.

In their discourse, leaders often use the vocabulary of the day but their emphasis will reveal where they stand. A regime conservative, such as former General Secretary of the Vietnam Communist Party (VCP) Le Kha Phieu, may embrace the ideas of "intra-party democracy", "socialist-oriented market economy", and Vietnam as a "modern nation" and a "friend and reliable partner to other countries", but his emphasis is on the class nature, as opposed to a whole-nation nature, of the party's core interests, preserving the country's "socialist" identity, and contrasting it with the "capitalist and imperialist" West. Modernization, reform, democracy, and international integration, if adopted, are only means to a higher end, and if necessary, can be sacrificed. That higher end is the continuation of the communist regime.1

A modernizer, such as the late Prime Minister Vo Van Kiet, may vow to maintain "the leadership role of the party" and build "socialism", but his visions of the party and socialism are completely different from those of the conservatives. Kiet and other modernizers within the VCP want a party that regards the interests of the entire nation as its own and define socialism as "a rich people, a strong nation, and a just, democratic, and civilized society". Patriotism, not Marxism-Leninism, is the bonding and guiding idea of the modernizers. Whereas conservatives such as the VCP chiefs Do Muoi, Le Kha Phieu, and Nong Due Mann emphatically asserted that "national independence and socialism" (meaning insulation from Western and liberal influence plus communist rule and identity) are the fundamentals of Vietnamese policy, Kiet proposed in a classified letter to the VCP Politburo in August 1995 to replace them with "nation and democracy".2 Although advocating multiparty democracy is impossible for mainstream elite modernizers because it is taboo, modernizers support more and deeper political reform to broaden democracy and enhance effectiveness.

Rent-seekers are opportunists who seek to maximize benefits, usually gained from government-granted privileges, regardless of the national interest as defined by either the conservatives or the modernizers. As will be seen in the next section, Vietnam's rent-seekers is a special group of profit-seekers that is more powerful than the latter because it has a monopolistic power in its back.

All the three key blocs - regime conservatives, modernizers, and rentseekers - are present both in and outside the ruling party and the government and represented at every echelon of policymaking. Their fault lines cut across generations, regions, and institutions. Most Vietnamese leaders stand more or less consistently within a bloc but some have changed blocs over time and others are more agnostic. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.