Academic journal article Homeland Security Affairs

Letter to the Editor: The Power of the "Few" - Response

Academic journal article Homeland Security Affairs

Letter to the Editor: The Power of the "Few" - Response

Article excerpt

February 2012

The Power of the Few - Response

I read Professor Tucker's letter to the editor the same week that Eastman Kodak filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, and Apple introduced the iBookstore platform (a disruptive effort of disintermediation reducing the publishing business to the scale of "the few"). In both cases, we are witnessing two organizations dealing with the challenge of disruptive innovations in very different ways.

In his letter, Professor Tucker claims that my article - "The Power of the Few" - presents an either/or proposition between networks and bureaucracies. It does not. As stated in the article, I am convinced that "bureaucracies are good organizations for managing iterative processes that are subject to continuous improvement loops and must be executed every time in the same way... They are the best solution to the problem of containing the same level of quality in a repetitive process."

The real challenge resides not in this false dichotomy between networks or centralized bureaucracies, but in the innovator's dilemma and the need to create managerial tools for the homeland security enterprise to deal with the fundamental differences between sustaining and disruptive vulnerabilities.

In the same way that highly structured backbones seem to be an unavoidable necessity for an optimal response to most operational iterative challenges, innovation platforms (spaces created by managerial choices that are mostly free of standard operating procedure and adhocratic in nature) have proven their effectiveness to deal with disruptive innovation, both in the private sector and in the public administration.

If what Professor Tucker argues in his letter were true, and "new technologies empower governments already more powerful than 'the few' as much and probably more than they empower 'the few,'" then there would be no innovator's dilemma. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.