Academic journal article Demokratizatsiya

Is Nationalism Rising in Russian Foreign Policy? the Case of Georgia

Academic journal article Demokratizatsiya

Is Nationalism Rising in Russian Foreign Policy? the Case of Georgia

Article excerpt

Western discussion during the last half-decade has increasingly focussed on an ''assertive" and even ''aggressive" Russian foreign policy that underpins an ever more confident global position. From a Russia that could only say "yes" in the 1990s, the West is apparently now confronting a Russia that can, and will, say "no."1

For many analysts, this assertive stance has been associated with distinct ideational underpinnings that have sought to challenge Western liberalism. Although ''sovereign democracy" has been the most obvious example, many have also argued that anti-Western nationalism has moved from the margins to the mainstream of Russian discourse during the Putin era.2 Moreover, this nationalism had, apparently, begun ineluctably to influence Russian foreign policy and to deepen the rhetorical and cognitive dissonance between Russia and the West. Indeed, as Edward Lucas argued, ''the ideological conflict of the New Cold War is between lawless Russian nationalism and law-governed Western multilateralism." 3

However, the role nationalism might have played in the Russia-Georgia War of August 2008 has been largely ignored. One of the most influential authors on the conflict, Ronald Asmus, did argue that ''by the summer of 2008 ... an increasingly nationalistic and revisionist Russia was ... rebelling against a system that it felt no longer met its interests and had been imposed on it during a moment of temporary weakness."4 Neither he nor other authors examined this in depth. Yet his contention can support a narrative of ''lawless Russian nationalism." Russia's recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia in defiance of Euro-Atlantic positions can be seen as the tipping-point when Russia began to substantiate its rhetoric and to export highly nationalistic internal values in an attempt to revise the post-Cold War order.

Nevertheless, hindsight perhaps confounds this view. Although the Western consensus is that Russia wanted and planned the war, Western and Georgian mistakes mean that a narrative of ''good" West versus ''evil" Russia (implicit in Lucas's account) cannot be convincingly maintained.5 More widely, the US-Russia ''reset" has involved a marked change of climate and de-escalation of rhetoric. Russia itself has focused increasingly on internal modernization, and the immediate fear that it was to pursue overt annexation of other contested regions like Crimea and Transnistria has receded. Finally, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev's modernization rhetoric is associated with increased efforts to control domestic nationalist excesses via greater law enforcement.6

In this article, I will trace the foreign policy influence of Russian nationalism from the Putin to the Medvedev eras, focussing specifically on Russian nationalist arguments for and reactions to the August 2008 conflict. The main questions in focus are: (1) What are the basic dynamics of the relationship between nationalism and foreign policy under Putin and Medvedev?; (2) What role did Russian nationalism play in the Russia-Georgia War? Was it a significant motivating factor in Russian conduct for the conflict as Asmus indicated?; and, (3) Overall, was the role of Russian nationalism in the war a corroboration of or a deviation from this general relationship? I will end with some observations about whether the influence of nationalism on Russian foreign policy has indeed decreased since 2008 and whether Russian nationalism presents a significant obstacle to the ''modernization" and ''resetting" of Russian policy.

I will argue that the typical relationship between Russian nationalism and foreign policy is a complex one-it is simply not the case that Russian nationalism is inherently expansionist and militarist, as some classic accounts argue.7 Even under Putin and Medvedev, the authorities have generally promoted a foreign policy based on ''statist nationalism" that is conservative as opposed to reactionary, and that is orientated toward pragmatism, not ideology. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.