Academic journal article et Cetera

(Sigma)EOS: A Fourth Non-Aristotelian Model

Academic journal article et Cetera

(Sigma)EOS: A Fourth Non-Aristotelian Model

Article excerpt




After describing briefly three earlier non-Aristotelian models, this paper presents a significant fragment of the EOS Model.

The differentiation between level and order leads to a recognition of multi/level/ordinality as a consideration in understanding such important notions as Identification, Allness, etc. The ZEOS Model assumes the interplay of four levels: Sign, Event, Object, and Symbol. It recognizes different timescales associated with these four levels. Three principal relations interconnect the levels: abstracting, semantic construction, and balance. A fourth relation, which operates within the Symbol level, semantic replacement, receives no treatment in this paper, for many of its details remain obscure.

A diagram called the "Relational Differential" summarizes the main features of the EOS Model. The Relational Differential expands and further explains Korzybski's two models. The writer states the premises underlying the EOS Model and offers a discussion of important aspects of those premises. He then presents several applications and suggests a number of promising areas for future research.

1. Introduction: Various Non-Aristotelian Models

ALFREDKORZYBSKIasserted that he "produced and formulated

General Semantics as the foundation of the first nonAristotelian system, based on the discovery of new relations, and so psycho-logical mechanisms." (Kendig, 1990; p. 816) Various people have commented on Korzybski's work, frequently working from a deficiency of understanding. This paper presents the foundations for a second non-Aristotelian system, congruent with the two models developed in varying degrees by Korzybski. Due to a significant shift in premises, it seems appropriate to consider this the beginning of a nonAristotelian, but non-Korzybskian, system. This does not mean an anti-Korzybskian system, for the post-Korzybskian models have grown from Korzybski's fundamental insights.

Since 1933, Korzybski and his followers have produced and elaborated upon what one might characterize as four epistemological models. In various degrees of detail, these models seek to explain how we interact with our physico-psychosemantic environments-as-a-whole-at-a-date, and hence how we can improve the manner in which we do so. The two primary models appeared in Korzybski's seminal Science and Sanity (Korzybski, 1933) and in his subsequent writings (cf. Kendig, 1990; p. 479, 563, and 683). He did not refer to his approaches as "models,' although he might have done so had he written in more recent times. We may cite the following as non-Aristotelian models related to the work of Korzybski:

(i) Korzybski's Model I.

Korzybski devoted almost all of Science and Sanity to explaining and justifying this model. He produced supporting psychological, psychiatric, physiological, physico-mathematical, etc., information to buttress his Model I, contained in Part VII of his hauptwerk. He regarded the Structural Differential as a diagrammatic summary of this model. Figure 1 contains an example of the Structural Differential as produced by Korzybski.

(ii) Korzybski's Model II.

Most of the material included in what this writer calls Korzybski's Model II appeared explicitly in Science and Sanity (Korzybski, 1933; p. 384), but without the diagram which he made available to students attending his seminars from 1944 to his death in March, 1950. A minimal amount of discussion of Model II, with the diagram, appeared in several publications (Kendig, 1990, as noted above) with the title, "An Extensional Analysis of the Process of Abstracting from an Electro-Colloidal Point of View." Figure 2 shows the diagram that accompanied those papers. Korzybski never elaborated this model beyond the rather brief discussion contained in the early mimeographed sheets. Apparently he still worried about and worked on this model at the time of his death. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.