Academic journal article Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences

Interior Design State Regulation: The Undermining Power of Perceptions

Academic journal article Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences

Interior Design State Regulation: The Undermining Power of Perceptions

Article excerpt

"It is not reality that matters but rather the perception of that reality" (Glynn, Herbst, O'Keefe, Shapiro, & Lindeman, 2004, p. 211). As qualified interior design professionals fight to have interior design recognized as a legal profession, they find perceptions of interior design to be the greatest obstacle (Moody, 2012); therefore, this paper explores the evolution of interior design and the role that perceptions play in the efforts to have it become a licensed profession.

Evolution of Interior Design

It is difficult to put a date on the birth of interior design (Coleman, 2002). In past centuries, architects designed building interiors and often worked with decorative arts specialists to provide final touches (Nielson & Taylor, 2002). The turn of the 20th-century realized the birth of interior decorators. Massey (2008) noted that interior decoration was one of the few professions led by women, particularly highly affluent women who catered primarily to the rich and famous (see also Turpin, 2007; White, 2009) and acted as arbiters of taste within high society. They were considered "in the know" and their personal taste was highly sought (Slotkis, 2006) as they focused on the embellishment of surfaces and the placement of furniture and accessories within a space (Jones & Allen, 2009)-that is, on aesthetics, beauty, and artful arrangements.

The use of the term interior designer did not occur until after World War II (Kilmer & Kilmer, 1992). The transition from interior decorators to interior designers was rooted in the post-World War II housing market. As architects focused on the postwar building boom, doors opened in the remodeling sector for interior decorators to expand their services from that of enhancing the aesthetics of a room to more complex and specialized skills involving client needs (Whitney, 2009). Interior designers began to concern themselves more with issues that affected their client's health, safety, and welfare (Friedrichs, 2002), while decorators continued to focus on the surface embellishments of the environment (Jones & Allen, 2009).

Some historians believe that the official arrival of the interior design profession can be traced to 1965 when the first interior design firm, Gensler, opened in San Francisco, California, with a focus on designing functional corporate interiors. Interior design was subsequently established as a separate profession from architecture and from interior decoration (Friedrichs, 2002; Moody, 2012). The practice of interior design has evolved into a complex and specialized discipline that utilizes a systematic process focusing on humans, their behaviors, and how their physical, social, and psychological needs are met by the interior environment (Guerin & Martin, 2004). Qualified interior designers go far beyond aesthetics to improve quality of life, increase productivity, and protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public within the built environment (Binggeli, 2007; Jensen, 2001). They attain the required skills through what has become known as the 3 Es: Education, Experience, and Examination (Moody, 2012).

The title interior designer is not protected by law and is often used interchangeably with interior decorator, a respected occupation within itself, but one that requires no formal education and has no impact on the health, safety, and welfare of the public (Friedrichs, 2002). As with any profession that is seeking legal recognition, interior designers believe that protection of the practice of interior design shields the public from potential harm in the event that sendees are rendered without proper training, credentialing, and government regulation.

Health, Safety, and Welfare of the Public

Professional state licenses attempt to guarantee the public's health, safety, and welfare through either a Title Act or a Practice Act (Moody, 2012). A Title Act protects those who meet a minimum competency to use a professional title, but it does not restrict practice of the occupation. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.