Academic journal article Asia - Pacific Issues

Seeking Justice on the Cheap: Is the East Timor Tribunal Really a Model for the Future?

Academic journal article Asia - Pacific Issues

Seeking Justice on the Cheap: Is the East Timor Tribunal Really a Model for the Future?

Article excerpt

In response to the spectacle of ethnic cleansing, mass executions, concentration camps, systematic torture, mass rape and sexual enslavement in Bosnia and Rwanda, the Security Council created the first ad hoc international criminal tribunals since Nuremberg and Tokyo. While during the Cold War the political stalemate on the UN Security Council had inhibited such responses to grave humanitarian crises, the new political constellations of the early 1990s ushered in a new era of cooperation to achieve international justice. The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) have now been trying cases for eight years-cases that have contributed enormously to the development of international humanitarian law.' Trials are also underway before a UN-sponsored tribunal in East Timor but there the results to date, as well as the prospects for the future, are far more questionable.

It was inevitable that the establishment of the ICTY and ICTR would lead to demands for further attempts to call to account those responsible for other serious, large-scale violations of international humanitarian law. While the Security Council has lacked the political will to respond in all such cases (e.g., Sudan or Congo), they did move to establish tribunals for Cambodia, Sierra Leone, and East Timor. Because of the expense and duration of the trials before the ICTR and ICTY, however, the Security Council has become increasingly reluctant to fund new international tribunals of this scale." The new model seems to have become smaller scale operations with far fewer personnel, involving international "hybrid" tribunals, negotiated by treaty between the United Nations and a national government.'" East Timor is the first place where such trials have actually taken place.

For the past five years the United Nations has been negotiating with the Cambodian government to create a joint UN/Cambodian hybrid tribunal to finally try some of those leaders responsible for the genocide of the Pol Pot regime in 1975-79, in which more than 1.5 million Cambodians perished. A new international/national hybrid tribunal has also been created by the United Nations for Sierra Leone. Despite delays due to funding problems, it will begin operations in late fall 2002, prosecuting cases involving the systematic murder, mutilation, rape, torture, and enslavement of civilians by the rebels during the civil war. In other instances governments have sought to forestall the United Nations from creating a tribunals by acting preemptively at the national level. Thus, the Indonesian government itself, since March 2002, has been conducting trials before Ad Hoc Human Rights Tribunals of military and political figures implicated in the murders, widespread destruction, and massive forced deportations in East Timor in 1999 (see box on page 4).

While there is no question that the trials conducted by the ICTR and ICTY constitute a major watershed, it is also true that significant challenges remain- challenges that are best assessed from a regional perspective by considering the work of the UN hybrid tribunal in East Timor.

East Timor

Following the UN's announcement of election results in East Timor in September 1999, Timorese militias, armed and supported by Indonesian army and security forces, perpetrated widespread violence resulting in the deaths of substantial numbers of civilians, widespread rape, destruction and looting of property, and forced mass displacement of civilian populations. On January 31, 2000, the United Nations made public the report of the UN International Commission of Inquiry on East Timor. The report documented the systematic and widespread nature of the terror and violence in East Timor (requirements for establishing that the violence constituted crimes against humanity) and recommended the establishment of an international tribunal under UN auspices.

The conclusions of this report were supported by the account of Indonesia's own investigation, conducted under the auspices of the Indonesian Human Rights Commission. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.