Academic journal article Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health

Long Working Hours and Use of Psychotropic Medicine: A Follow-Up Study with Register Linkage

Academic journal article Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health

Long Working Hours and Use of Psychotropic Medicine: A Follow-Up Study with Register Linkage

Article excerpt

The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union recognizes long working hours as an occupational safety and health hazard. The issue is addressed in the EU Working Time Directive, which, among other things, decrees that member states shall take the measures necessary to ensure that the average working time for each 7-day period, including overtime, does not exceed 48 hours (1).

A recent review concluded that long working hours are associated with an increased risk of depressive states, anxiety, and sleep disorders (2). It has, moreover, been suggested that not only "very much overtime" (49-100 work hours/week) but also "moderate overtime" (41-48 work hours/week) seems to be associated with an increased risk of mental distress (3).

The evidence behind the above conclusions and suggestions is however quite weak and mainly based on studies which are either cross-sectional (3-5) or of low statistical power (6-9). Moreover, none of the concerned research papers documented or claimed that their hypotheses and statistical models were completely defined before the data analysis began.

The underlying null hypothesis of the present project was that long working hours, to the extent they are currently practiced in Denmark, neither add to nor subtract from the national burden of mental ill health.

The hypothesis was operationalized and tested in a prospective cohort study on a random sample of the general working population of Denmark. The null hypothesis would be rejected if subsequent rates of mental ill health (manifested by the use of psychotropic medicine) among people with long working hours at baseline differed significantly from those among people with normal working hours. Special attention was paid to overtime work within the limits of the EU Working Time Directive (41-48 hours/week).

We also wanted know: (i) if the effect was independent of age, gender, shiftwork, and socioeconomic status (SES); (ii) if the results would change if the analysis was controlled for self-rated mental health, job satisfaction; and job insecurity; and (iii) what the estimated effect would be if we restricted the outcome to antidepressants, anxiolytics and hypnotics and sedatives, respectively.

We launched the study with an open mind, believing that some cases of mental ill-health would be caused while others would be prevented by long working hours (10). On the one hand, we knew that long working hours are associated with short sleep (11), which is a risk factor for psychiatric disorders (12). On the other hand, we knew that long working hours may increase income, and thereby decrease the risk of financial strain, a condition proven to be highly predictable of psychiatric disorders (13-15).

Methods

To prevent hindsight bias, the hypotheses and statistical methods of the study were completely defined, peerreviewed, and published in a detailed study protocol (10) before the exposure and the outcome data were linked. The two first paragraphs of the study protocol's data material section and the information that was given about the statistical methods of the primary and secondary analyses will be reproduced in their entirety in the present paper. The remaining parts of the material and methods of the study will only be described briefly. Further details are given in the study protocol.

Data material

The project data were obtained through a linkage of interview data from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) study sample of 2004, the Danish National Working Environment Survey (DANES) of 2008, and the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study (DWECS) of 1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010 with data from the Central Person Register (CPR), the Employment Classification Module (ECM), and the Danish National Prescription Registry (DNPR). Participants' unique personal identification numbers were used as the key in the linkage procedure. DNPR covers all purchases of prescription drugs at pharmacies in Denmark since 1995, regardless of whether or not they were reimbursed (16). …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.