Academic journal article The American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

Intellectual Property and Gender: Reflections on Accomplishments and Methodology

Academic journal article The American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law

Intellectual Property and Gender: Reflections on Accomplishments and Methodology

Article excerpt

I. INTRODUCTION

This essay answers the invitation of the organizers of the annual Intellectual Property/Gender Symposium at American University Washington College of Law, after ten years of symposia, to consider how the next ten years of scholarship in the area of intellectual property (IP) "might open up new insights regarding the production of knowledge, commodification, definition and valuation of women's work, and other areas of feminist and queer inquiry."1 I do so by thinking retrospectively, using two investigative axes, both infused by a feminist frame.

The first axis is a literature review, less frequently seen as an end in itself in law than in other disciplines, perhaps to our loss.2 Examining the scholarship of IP and gender produced over the past ten years, I document what has been accomplished in terms of quantity and publication venues as evidence of shifting conversations and community building. Turning to the content of this work, I argue that with respect to traditional IP, that is, copyright, patent and trademark,3 considering gender and IP has yielded results in three areas: identifying gender disparity in participation in IP systems and its causes, identifying disparity in the application of IP doctrines to subject matter that involves gender and sexuality, and revealing the gendered nature of facially gender-neutral IP doctrines.

The second axis draws upon my personal experiences writing and publishing in the area of gender and IP to consider the methodologies of this project. As an interdisciplinary scholar using history to investigate law, I am frequently forced to confront issues of translation, transcendence and transmittal that I argue are relevant to all scholars interested in what the organizers describe as "creating intellectual property law that fosters social justice."4 How do we translate the insights of feminist and queer theory into IP and information law, areas where gender has remained remarkably invisible?5 How do we transcend subject matter boundaries to create new insights? And perhaps most challenging of all, how do we transfer those insights to scholars who do not write or think about gender, to students in classrooms, and to those who write and pass laws so that we shape IP law to promote gender equality? I use the feminist approach of finding the political in the personal to integrate these two axes and identify the key challenges and opportunities for all of us who wish to contribute to the endeavor begun by these symposia.

II. ACCOMPLISHMENTS

In science, the literature review article is an established genre, considered an important professional service in its gathering and sorting of key scholarship, thus creating a launch pad for the next generation of research. In the law review literature, we have an ambivalent relationship to literature review. We require some version of it in every article, but we do not particularly value it, and confine it to footnotes.6 I offer this brief literature review in the hopes that it will be of use, as a scientific version might be, but also as a form of feminist scholarship, naming and claiming the past in order that it might be celebrated and valued, as well as used.

A. Generating Scholarship and Creating Connections

I want to start with the overall conclusion of this literature review: the IP/Gender Symposia that the American University Washington College of Law Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property, the Woman and the Law Program and the Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law have jointly sponsored have been a rousing success. To quote Charles Dickens, "this must be distinctly understood, or nothing wonderful can come of the story I am going to relate."7 This success is evidenced both in the volume of work produced, and in the scholarly community created, a community that can be traced in the academic literature.8

The project of creating a bibliography of intellectual property and gender scholarship is, in the best possible way, endless. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.