The Effects of Increased Private Health Insurance: A Review of the Evidence

Article excerpt

TO THE EDITORS: I refer to your September 2004 edition which contained an article by Professor Don Hindle and Mr Ian McAuley titled "The effects of increased private health insurance: a review of the evidence".1

This article included commentary on two pieces of research concerning the 30% Private Health Insurance Rebate which were commissioned by Medibank Private in 2003, one published by Professor Ian Harper2 and the second published jointly by Professor Harper and Mr Chris Murphy.3 The article questioned the independence of the reports, and also queried whether Medibank Private should be involved in spending money on such research. This commentary is misleading and incorrect.

Medibank Private commissioned the research in order to understand better the economic benefits of the 30% rebate on the Australian health system, and to contribute to the public debate on issues concerning the rebate. The academic analysis that was conducted was objective and independent and the reports' findings underline the need to maintain our world-class mixed health care system. Medibank Private has also conducted market research with member focus groups to ascertain the direct value and impact of the 30% rebate and other initiatives for our members, and has published a brochure explaining how these initiatives benefit our members.

We will continue to invest in research into the health care system to improve public understanding of the economic dynamics of the sector. …


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.