Academic journal article Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Implicit Learning of Ignored Visual Context

Academic journal article Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Implicit Learning of Ignored Visual Context

Article excerpt

Humans process a visual display more efficiently when they encounter it for a second time, showing learning of the display. This study tests whether implicit learning of complex visual contexts depends on attention. Subjects searched for a white target among black and white distractors. When the locations of the target and the attended set (white distractors) were repeated, search speed was enhanced, but when the locations of the target and the ignored set (black distractors) were repeated, search speed was unaffected. This suggests that the expression of learning depends on attention. However, during the transfer test, when the previously ignored set now was attended, it immediately facilitated performance. In contrast, when the previously attended set now was ignored, it no longer enhanced search speed. We conclude that the expression of visual implicit learning depends on attention but that latent learning of repeated information does not.

The role of attention in perception and memory is one of the longest standing debates in cognitive psychology. Extensive evidence suggests that perception and memory are attention dependent. For example, Rock and Gutman (1981) asked subjects to study a red outline shape overlaying a green outline shape and to rate how much they liked it. After many trials of aesthetic judgment, the subjects were given a surprise memory test in which they had to sort out the exposed shapes from novel ones. The subjects were able to recognize the shapes they had attended to, but not the ones they had ignored. In another study, Mack and Rock (1998) presented subjects with a cross shape, followed by a mask. The subjects were asked to judge whether the horizontal or the vertical segment of the cross was longer. After they had done this three times, something else, such as a dot, a word, or a shape, was presented near the cross. A substantial proportion of the subjects, when queried later, denied ever seeing the additional stimulus. These data suggest that attention is the gateway to perception and memory.

However, recent studies have shown that unattended objects often leave implicit traces that can be revealed indirectly. For example, using Rock and Gutman's (1998) stimuli, DeSchepper and Treisman (1996) found that ignored shapes produced a negative priming effect: Responses to the ignored shapes were slower when they later became targets. Using Mack and Rock's (1998) procedure, Moore and Egeth (1997) found that an unnoticed additional stimulus could affect perception of an attended stimulus. For example, when unexpected stimuli were arranged into arrowheads, they could produce the MullerLyer illusion. Consistent with such findings, Mack and Rock found that one's own name is often detected in the inattentional blindness procedure. They suggested that attention is not a gateway to perception and memory in general; it is only a gateway to conscious perception and explicit memory. Implicit processes are exempted from attentional limitations.

This study is concerned with the relationship between attention and implicit learning, an issue that has not been fully resolved. The role of attention has previously been studied primarily in the serial reaction time (SRT) task (Nissen & Bullemer, 1987). In this task, four positions are shown on the computer screen, each with a corresponding response key. An asterisk appears randomly in one location, and subjects press the corresponding key. Once they have pressed the key, the asterisk jumps to another location, and the subjects must press that key, and so on. Unknown to the subjects, the sequence of locations in which the asterisk appears follows a fixed 10-item sequence, such as BCADBCACBD. Many subjects do not notice the repetition, but their reaction times (RTs) are shorter for repeated than for novel sequences as the experiment progresses. When the SRT task is paired with a secondary tone-counting task, presumed to take away attentional resources, some studies have shown a reduction in learning (e. …

Author Advanced search

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.