Gendered Resources, Division of Housework, and Perceived Fairness-A Case in Urban China

Article excerpt

Drawing upon equity and gender theories, we investigate Chinese couples' perceived fairness of the wife's disproportionately heavy household responsibility. Data come from in-depth interviews with 39 married couples in Beijing during the summer of 1998. Although housework division remained unequal among dual-earner couples, the majority of wives and husbands saw it as fair. We explore the notion of gendered resources by examining husbands' and wives' opinions about both paid and domestic work. We find that husband's breadwinner role and wife's housekeeper role retain their primary place in the family and that gender-role expectations produce gendered resources to both wives and husbands. These expectations release both the husbands, who have fulfilled the provider role, from the obligation to share housework equally, and the wives, who combine paid and domestic work, from an equal responsibility of breadwinning. Therefore, the failure to bring adequate gendered resources to a marriage, rather than the unequal distribution of housework, causes a sense of unfairness.

Key Words: gendered resources, housework, perceived fairness, urban Chinese couples.

NOTE

This paper was presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association in Chicago, August 1998. The project was partially supported by American Philosophical Society.

[Reference]

REFERENCES

[Reference]

Andors, P. (1983). The unfinished liberation of Chinese women. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Beijing Municipal Statistical Bureau. (1999). Beijing statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House.

Bian, Y., Shu, X., & Logan, J. R. (2000). Wage and job inequalities in the working careers of men and women in Tianjin. In B. Entwisle & G. Henderson (Eds.), Redrawing boundaries: Gender, households, and work in China (pp. 111-133). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Blood, R. O., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives. New York: Free Press.

Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender, and

[Reference]

the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652-688.

Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333-355.

Coltrane, S. (1996). Family man: Fatherhood, housework, and gender equity. New York: Oxford University Press.

Curtis, R. E (1986). Household and family in theory of inequality. American Sociological Review, 51, 168183.

[Reference]

Daly, K. (1992). The fit between qualitative research and characteristics of families. In J. F Gilgun, K. Daly, & G. Handel (Eds.), Qualitative methods in family research (pp. 3-11). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

England, P, & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment, and gender: A social, economic and demographic view. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

England, P, & Kilbourne, B. S. (1990). Markets, marriages, and other mates: The problem of power. In R. Friedland & A. E Robertson (Eds.), Beyond the marketplace: Rethinking economy and society (pp. 163188). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Feng, L., Anderson, A., Wang, S., & Zhang, J. (1995). Research on marriage, family and women's status in Beijing. Beijing: Beijing Economic Institute.

Ferree, M. M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: Feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 866-884.

Ferree, M. M. (1991). The gender division of labor in two-earner marriages. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 158-179.

Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking Penguin.

Hochschild, A. (1997). The time bind. New York: Metropolitan Books.

[Reference]

Humans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace.

Honig, E., & Hershatter, G. (1988). Personal voices. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Hood, J. C. (1986). The provider role: Its meaning and measurement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 349-359.

Lennon, M. C., & Rosenfield, S. (1994). Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 506531.

Mirowsky, J. (1985). Depression and marital power: An equity model. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 557-592.

Parish, W. L., & Busse, S. (2000). Gender and work. In W. Tang & W. L. Parish (Eds.), Chinese urban life under reform (pp. 209-231), Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Potuchek, J. L. (1997). Who supports the family? Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Sha, J. (1995). Women's domestic status in contemporary China. Tianjin: Tianjin People's Press.

[Reference]

South, J. S., & Spitze, G. (1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Review, 59, 327-347.

Stacey, J. (1983). Patriarchy and socialist revolution in China. Berkeley: University of California Press. Steil, J. M. (1997). Marital equality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[Reference]

Tan, S. (1994). Contemporary working women: assigned jobs by the government or by the labor market. In X. Li (Ed.), Gender in China (pp. 78-92). Beijing: San Lian Shu Dian.

Tao, C., & Jiang, Y. (1993). A review of the social status of women in China. Beijing: Chinese Women's Press. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.

Thompson, L. (1991). Family work: Women's sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 181-195. Wang, Z. (1998). Research on women in contemporary

China. In G. Hershatter, E. Honig, S. Mann, & L. Rofel (Eds.), Guide to women's studies in China (pp. 3-43). Center for Chinese Studies, Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California-Berkeley.

Weiss, R. S. (1987). Men and their wives' work. In F Corsby (Eds.), Spouse, parent, worker: On gender and multiple roles (pp. 109-21). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers. New York: Free Press.

West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125-151.

Whyte, M. K., & Parish, W. L. (1984). Urban life in contemporary China. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[Reference]

Wilkie, J. R., Ferree, M. M., & Ratcliff, K. S. (1998). Gender and fairness: Marital satisfaction in two-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 577-594.

Wolf, M. (1984). Marriage, family, and the state in contemporary China. Pacific Affairs, 57, 213-236. Zheng, X. (1997). On the phenomenon of female retreat

to the home. In Y. Zhao & L. Guo (Eds.), Social transition and women's development (pp. 113-120). Beijing: Chinese Women's Press.

Zhou, X., Brandon, N. T, & Moen, P (1996). Stratification dynamics under state socialism: The case of urban China, 1949-1993. Social Forces, 74, 759796.

[Reference]

Zhou, X., & Moen, P (in press). Job shift patterns of husbands and wives in urban China. In H. Blossfeld & S. Drobnic (Eds.), Couples' careers: A dynamic perspective. London: Oxford University Press.

Zhou, X., Tama, N. B., & Moean, P (1996). Stratification dynamics under state socialism: The case of urban China, 1949-1993. Social Forces, 74, 759-796.

Zvonkovic, A. M., Greaves, K. M., Schmiege, C. J., & Hall, L. D. (1996). The marital construction of gender through work and family decisions: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 78-90.

[Author Affiliation]

JIPING ZUO St. Cloud State University YANJIE BIAN* University of Minnesota and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

[Author Affiliation]

Department of Sociology and Anthropology, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, MN 56301 (soczuo@ stcloudstate.edu).

[Author Affiliation]

*Department of Sociology, University of Minnesota, 952 Social Sciences, 267 19th Ave. S, Minneapolis, MN 55455.