Academic journal article Journal of Competitiveness Studies

Sexual Harassment and Morality among Leadership and Frontline Employees, Especially in Male-Dominated Industries 1

Academic journal article Journal of Competitiveness Studies

Sexual Harassment and Morality among Leadership and Frontline Employees, Especially in Male-Dominated Industries 1

Article excerpt


The popular literature from the past 30 years is replete with stories of sexual harassment and court cases (for example, Tuttle, 1990; Anderson, 1993; McCoy, 2017; Scheiber & Creswell, 2017). Lately, the "#MeToo" slogan has sparked an anti-sexual harassment movement. Interestingly, the phrase was coined by Tarana Burkey in 2006 to support mainly women of color who were survivors of sexual assault (Langone, 2018). However, when actress Ashley Judd accused media mogul Harvey Weinstein in October 2017, the deluge of the #MeToo social media campaign started devouring mainly high-profile media personalities and politicians in the USA.

The movements "#MeToo" and "#Timesup"- started on January 1, 2018-have created an awareness about the high prevalence of sexual harassment and assaults across a variety of industries that has existed in somewhat labor-intensive, male-dominated industries involving a low-skilled labor force. This paper attempts to bring this issue to the fore.

The paper first presents a brief discussion on sex-based discrimination and the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Next, a brief literature review is presented on leadership, ethics, and sexual harassment, following which a trend analysis of sexual harassment data is presented. Thereafter, a discussion of sexual harassment in labor-intensive industries and related operations management issues is presented. The last section of the paper presents a conclusion and future research potentials.


Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination based on sex, race, color, national origin, and religion. Sexual harassment, considered a form of sexual discrimination, falls under the purview of Title VII ( Even though the Civil Rights act was passed in 1964, it was not until 1980 when the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) first stated that sexual harassment was sex discrimination covered under the Civil Rights Act and issued guidelines for "establishing criteria for determining when unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature constitutes sexual harassment" ( Further, EEOC defined "the circumstances under which an employer may be held liable suggesting affirmative steps an employer should take to prevent sexual harassment" ( Finally, in 1986, in a landmark decision on the case of Meritor Savings Bank vs. Vinson, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that sexual harassment is illegal under the 1964 Civil Rights Act (Taylor, 1986). Taylor summarized the court decision by stating that severe and pervasive sexual harassment creates a hostile workplace, even when "the unwelcome sexual demands are not linked to concrete employment benefits."

It is important to note that sexual harassment is not just limited to an egregious demand for sex for continued employment but can begin with joking around that is in bad taste (Tuttle, 1990). EEOC's webpage describes sexual harassment as "Unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature [that] constitute sexual harassment when this conduct explicitly or implicitly affects an individual's employment, unreasonably interferes with an individual's work performance, or creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive work environment." Sexual harassment, as recognized by the courts under Title VII of Civil Rights Act, can be of two types: 1) quid pro quo, where sexual favors are sought in exchange of benefits or avoidance of detriments, and 2) hostile work environment, where sexual harassment is severe and widespread, creating a threatening work environment ( Although most of the allegations are made by women against men, the reverse situations also exist. Just recently, Dr. Nimrod Reitman accused his female doctoral advisor, Dr. Avital Ronell, of Title IX violation and New York University's internal investigation found the world-famous professor responsible for sexual harassment (Greenberg, 2018). …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.