Magazine article ADWEEK

Why Super Bowl Spots Are Often Disappointing

Magazine article ADWEEK

Why Super Bowl Spots Are Often Disappointing

Article excerpt

Yes, I know you're sick of reading about the Super Bowl spots. But we need to address the sense of letdown many people felt last Sunday in order to forestall such a mishap in 2005.

For starters, we didn't hear many people last week saying, "The commercials are better than the game." It's a statistical fluke, though, that this catch phrase took hold in the first place. In the five Super Bowls starting with 1984's (i.e., when the game assumed its role as creative showcase), the average margin of victory was 27.6 points. The smallest gap was 19 points. These games were duds, so it's easy to see bow the "commercials-are-better" idea took root. By contrast, the margin of victory in the five most recent games has averaged 13.4 points, with three games decided by 7 points or less. This has set a standard of excitement that's harder for the spots to match.

Progress in product quality--and relative stasis in ad quality--creates another problem, unrelated to the games themselves. Among the 10 most popular spots as measured by USA Today's annual Ad Meter, nine were for no-tech products that have changed little if at all in years. (Beer and soda dominated this end of the list.) Scoring in the lower half of the class were FedEx, IBM, Expedia, Monster, Cialis and Levitra--i.e., brands whose products weren't nearly as good (or hadn't even been invented) 20 years ago. Part of the gap in the spots' popularity has to do with mere familiarity. But this pattern may also relate to the relative quality of product and ad. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.