Magazine article University Business

Helping the Board to Help Itself: Is Your Board of Trustees Effective? after It Answers These Five Questions, You'll Know

Magazine article University Business

Helping the Board to Help Itself: Is Your Board of Trustees Effective? after It Answers These Five Questions, You'll Know

Article excerpt

For those helping to determine university direction in recent years, life has become increasingly complicated, and economic challenges have only made the job more (shall we say?) interesting. But that doesn't mean that your board of trustees should be any less effective. In fact, senior administrators can help boards process business at the highest possible level of effectiveness, if they pose these five questions annually:

Question #1: To what degree is the board willing to test its assumptions, beliefs, and traditions in order to evaluate its own performance?

This first question is an overarching, strategy-level question; the following four are actually subquestions. But it's important to know that university and nonprofit boards often perform poorly when it comes to testing assumptions, deep-seated beliefs, and traditions. In part, this is due to a natural tendency (especially among long-term board members) to maintain the comfort level of the existing status quo. And the resistance to self-evaluate can in fact come from overconfidence (particularly among alumni members) in their knowledge of the institution's history and therefore perceived future direction and goals. Yet, the truth of the matter is that in honoring cultural expectations and habitual patterns of thinking that may be out of alignment with the needs of the institution, boards may be executing dated and ineffective strategies that can no longer be justified in today's dynamic leadership environment.

Question #2: To what degree is the board willing to ask whether the mission must be revisited, or whether the board's vision of how the mission will be achieved must be revisited?

To be truly effective, on a periodic basis, a board must:

* Examine opportunities, new conditions, and emerging issues that mayor may not change the mission, but will definitely change the pathway to accomplishing the mission.

* Ask what level of mission-based risk the institution should be willing to take. (Missions are often rethought after assessment.)

* Ask how it will deal with competing priorities, using a strategy that management guru Peter Drucker calls "purposeful abandonment." (That is, it everything cannot be accomplished--especially in an environment of scarce resources--what sacred cows should be abandoned al this point in time?)

Question #3: To what degree is the board focused on governance rather than management?

Boards are most successful when they limit their activities to the strategy level. Only here can they can guide the institution, keeping it on a straight course for the long-term good of the whole.

Ways to achieve a focus on governance include:

* Devote ample time during board orientations to address and discuss the specific differences between governance and day-today management roles.

* Empower staff members with the responsibility for ensuring that board members do not blur the lines between appropriate policy-level inquiries and attempts to delve into management issues.

An effective board that knows the difference between governance and management is a prerequisite for a successful leadership team. A valuable tool for evaluating the board's effectiveness is the self-assessment tool published by the Association of Governing Boards (, Presidential and Board Assessment in Higher Education: Purposes, Policies und Strategies (Richard T. Ingram and William A. Weary, 2000). It focuses on the effective execution of key leadership, management, and fiduciary responsibilities. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.