Magazine article Editor & Publisher

Bias Numbers: Less Than Meets the Eye?

Magazine article Editor & Publisher

Bias Numbers: Less Than Meets the Eye?

Article excerpt

With charges of media bias, left and right, flying faster than ever, a Pew survey on newsroom attitudes released on May 23 was certain to intensify the conflict. Indeed, its section on journalists' political beliefs almost produced hysteria. For some on the right, it wasn't enough that Pew confirmed that self-described liberals, though a minority in the newsroom, far outnumber conservatives. These partisans charged (in numerous articles and in many letters to E&P) that those within the "moderate" majority were actually all liberals in disguise.

Pew, as you may recall, found that at national news outlets, liberals outnumbered conservatives 34% to 7% and at local outlets by 23% to 12%.

Apparently John Gibson of Fox News was referring to the Pew Survey on July 12, when he moved that entire moderate majority to the left, then claimed that "80-some percent of reporters are self-described liberals." Ironically, in that commentary, Gibson was defending Fox News from charges of conservative bias -- even as he illustrated it. The following day, Rush Limbaugh repeated the 80% figure, explicitly citing Pew.

Accurately portrayed or not, the latest Pew results received tremendous attention. And while few could question the general finding that there are more liberals than conservatives at newspapers, is the spread really as wide as the roughly 4-to-1 reported by Pew? A check of the survey's methodology suggests the findings should be taken with a chunk of salt.

When the Pew Survey was released, not many looked behind the numbers to find out exactly who was answering the questions. Few media outlets that covered the results observed, for example, that this survey made no claims of being accurate to X or Y percentage point.

Looking at the methodology provided by Pew online, one finds the entire sample included a total of 547 journalists. It seemed broadly based, however, reaching reporters and executives at national and local outlets, and spanning newspapers, magazines, wire services, TV, radio, and Web.

But was it really a fair sample, at least in the newspaper sphere? Those queried, Pew said, came only from papers in the top 100 by circulation. That's hardly representative, since it left unsampled the vast majority of the nation's 1,456 dailies (not to mention some highly influential weeklies). All of the newspaper journalists worked in cities the size of Syracuse, N.Y., Albuquerque, N.M., or larger.

Then, for some reason, Pew separated out 16 papers (all in the top 25 by circulation) and placed them in the "national" media section, leaving the rest in the "local" category. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.