Magazine article American Banker

Senate Bill Seen Linking Interstate, Insurance

Magazine article American Banker

Senate Bill Seen Linking Interstate, Insurance

Article excerpt

WASHINGTON - Despite reservations within the Clinton administration, the Senate Banking Committee appears likely to vote this month on legislation authorizing interstate branching and limiting bank insurance powers.

People familiar with the committee's plans say that Chairman Donald W. Riegle wants to take up insurance and interstate legislation during the third week of the month as the panel considers his fair trade in financial services bill.

The Michigan Democrat has made it clear lately, most recently in a speech to The Bankers Roundtable, that the interstate and insurance issues are firmly linked. "He said that was the package they are working on," said Anthony T. Cluff, president of the big bank trade group.

Opposition to Linkage

Most large banks would firmly oppose a bill that links the two issues, and that could doom interstate branching legislation - just as it did in 1991.

"Interstate is a second tier issue for me," said Citicorp chairman John Reed in a brief interview here last week. "Insurance is a high priority."

Mr. Reed applauded the Clinton administration for arguing last week that the two issues should be dealt with separately, but he conceded that it could be difficult for the Treasury to fend off the insurance lobby.

"I don't know if they can be kept separate," he said. "My political people tell me it would be tough."

Time Running Short

The Senate vote would likely come during the final days of this year's congressional session and could easily end up being postponed as lawmakers rush to deal with last-minute details.

In the past, the panel has supported both interstate branching and curbs on bank insurance powers. Most observers believe similar legislation would pass easily again this year.

By contrast, the House Banking Committee has shown a decided preference for keeping the two issues separate - in part to avoid jurisdictional disputes with rival committees. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.