Can the Clash of Civilizations Produce Alternate Energy Sources? with the War in Iraq and the Muddle of the Middle East, the Time Is Ripe for the U.S. to Reduce Its Dependence on Oil from the Persian Gulf-But Where Can the Country Turn for New Sources of Energy?

Article excerpt

IN THE SUMMER of 1993, Samuel Huntington published an article in Foreign Affairs that introduced an apt phrase into the lexicon of futurologists: "The Clash of Civilizations." Huntington maintained that the fundamental source of conflict in this century would be cultural rather than economic or ideological. While the clash that is developing between the Muslim world and the West is indeed cultural, it is driven by the economics of energy and, in particular, oil.

The use of oil is widespread in industry and will be irreplaceable in the transportation sector for decades. It also will be in short supply soon, according to Claude Mandil, executive director of the International Energy Agency, who warns that "the world's energy economy is on a pathway that is plainly not sustainable," and is one that will lead from "crisis to crisis." The IEA predicts that many of the oil fields the U.S. and Europe depend on will peak in the next five to seven years--and this includes those of Russia, the U.S., Mexico, and Norway. It is estimated that world energy demand will increase at least 50% by 2030. To meet this demand, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), where most of the world's remaining readily accessible oil is found, practically will have to double its production. Most of that increase must come from Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Iraq.

"Peak oil" theorists assert that there will be growing conflict over the remaining oil resources and a high probability of a worldwide economic collapse. Such claims, however, show a misunderstanding of the meaning of "oil reserves." These reserves depend on price and are not a direct measure of the amount of oil physically available in the ground. There is plenty of oil, perhaps as much as the 7.2 trillion barrels estimated by ExxonMobil, but these reserves cannot be brought to market as cheaply as oil from the Persian Gulf, and the economics of oil dictate that cheaper oil will be used first. Moreover, these sources cannot begin production immediately; there is a ramp-up period of years. If the phasing in of such reserves does not match the decline of current oil fields, rising prices and conflict over resources are inevitable.

The members of OPEC recently agreed to cut production to show their determination to defend $60 per barrel as a minimum international price. This is high enough to allow a good profit to be made on oil from shale or tar sands, of which North America has enormous quantities. However, the Saudis know full well that it is unlikely anyone will invest the many billions of dollars needed to produce enough oil from these sources to threaten OPEC dominance. OPEC is a cartel and, if such an investment were to be made, OPEC would pump enough oil to drop world prices to the point where the investment would be threatened.

Saudi Arabia's costs of production certainly are below $60 per barrel. Remember, Saudi Arabia even turned a profit when oil was $15 per barrel a decade ago. However, the Saudis no longer have the flexibility they had in the 1990s. Samba, a Riyadh-based bank, estimates the Saudis now need at least $38 a barrel to fund the lavish lifestyle of the kingdom's royal family and its social welfare state. By 2010, they will need $65 a barrel. This constraint offers the West an opportunity to begin investment in secondary oil recovery as well as shale and tar sands.

The price of oil should not be measured in dollars alone, however. Because of the vast sums pouring into the Gulf region--and Saudi Arabia in particular--we also pay a price in blood: It is no accident that 15 of the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. It is the source of Wahhabism, an intolerant form of Islam, and the Saudis have used their vast wealth to spread it far beyond the land of its birth. Indeed, oil money from the Gulf also funds the terrorist activity of al Qaeda, Hamas, and Hezbollah.

In fact, after the discovery of oil, the extremist Wahhabi sect found itself in possession of "wealth beyond the dreams of avarice," says Near Eastern Studies scholar Bernard Lewis. …


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.