Magazine article Science News

Just Say No to Prostate Screening

Magazine article Science News

Just Say No to Prostate Screening

Article excerpt

Some health experts now argue that many men suffering from prostate cancer don't need treatment - they will die of something else before their slow-growing tumor becomes terminal (SN: 6/5/93, p.367).

However, a new study takes that hands-off approach a big step further, arguing against mass screenings for the disease. Men without symptoms are better off avoiding tests for prostate cancer, the second leading cause of cancer death among men, a team of researchers contends.

"In the aggregate, we predict that screening will result in net harm rather than net health improvement," report Murray D. Krahn of the University of Toronto and his colleagues in the Sept. 14 Journal of the American Medical Association.

However, the study has numerous limitations, Gerald W. Chodak of the Louis A. Weiss Memorial Hospital in Chicago warns in the same issue of the journal. Most important, the researchers base their entire analysis on a one-time screening, although physicians recommend that men get tested regularly.

Kahn says the new study suggests that repeated screenings would yield results similar to those from a one-time exam.

The new recommendation also rankles many cancer specialists, who now advise men to be tested regularly to catch the disease in its early stages. Early detection, they argue, increases the chances of survival.

Krahn and his colleagues calculated the risks and benefits of widespread screening for prostate cancer. They analyzed data on, for example, reduced quality of life as a result of treatments, how much screening and treatment extend life, and the cost of testing. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.