Magazine article New Zealand Management

When Opposites Attract: Building a Learning Organisation

Magazine article New Zealand Management

When Opposites Attract: Building a Learning Organisation

Article excerpt

In 2004, the learning and development roles of the ANZ Bank and National Bank of New Zealand were merged. How were two distinct systems and brands effectively blended?

They say opposites attract. Certainly when ANZ and National Bank of New Zealand came together in 2004 they were two very separate and distinct organisations.

It was the first time in New Zealand that banks this size had merged and the first time internationally that a bank had chosen to operate a dual brand strategy. But it wasn't just about how to manage this operationally. There were also challenges for shared services, such as learning and development (L&D).

Prior to the merger, National Bank operated a centralised model with some L&D consultancy, trainers and in-house administration but no learning management system. Everything was done face to face and learning was predominantly focused on meeting 'business as usual' operational need.

In contrast, ANZ New Zealand had an established learning management system, mainly utilised for risk and compliance training, and had limited customised face-to-face learning, predominantly developed in response to project-related learning needs.

National Bank had a centralised L&D budget and allocated amounts per business unit, while ANZ business units chose what they wanted and paid for that themselves.

Then there were the learning and development needs of those staff in the corporate centre, which had been managed in an ad-hoc manner within both banks historically. Post integration, the nearly one-third of the 10,000 staff working for ANZ National had unique learning needs of their own.

Both organisations were limited, in different ways, by their restricted channels of L&D delivery.

MOVING FORWARD Our task was to blend the best of both banks' approaches to learning, and set a clear direction for the future, that was congruent with the People Capital strategy and that of the various business units that learning supports. We were, effectively, starting from scratch.

When we look back now at the challenges we faced, we appreciate how big it was. At the time, we chose to take a pragmatic approach, identifying long-term goals where known, and ensuring that where there was ambiguity, our short-term solutions did not constrain our long-term choices. We then set about chunking the work down into manageable lots that we could go through systematically.

From the start we were very clear about the need to ensure all learning was seamlessly aligned with other People Capital frameworks and therefore worked closely with teams building the new ANZ National leadership competency and performance management approaches. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.