Magazine article American Banker

Bill to Save Farmer Mac Languishes as Lawmakers Quibble over Details

Magazine article American Banker

Bill to Save Farmer Mac Languishes as Lawmakers Quibble over Details

Article excerpt

Despite opposition from Republican lawmakers, the Clinton administration continues to insist that state-chartered banks and thrifts ante up $200 million a year for federal exams.

The exam fees are part of the administration's plan to balance the federal budget by 2002. But with negotiations stalled, bankers are gnashing their teeth like furloughed federal workers.

House Banking Committee Chairman Jim Leach and his staff are trying to convince Capitol Hill colleagues that state banks should not have to pay for federal exams. Rep. Leach said he expects bipartisan opposition to the President's plan, but nevertheless warned bankers on Wednesday not to let up.

"They're telling us to be vigilant. No one knows what deal is going to be cut," said Kenneth Guenther, executive vice president of the Independent Bankers Association of America.

Besides, though Congress rejected similar proposals in 1992 and 1994, some Democrats who blocked new fees in the past are backing away from active opposition. Nebraska Sen. Jim Exon, the ranking Democrat on the budget committee, has never supported the fees, but now considers "everything on the table in these budget negotiations," a spokesman said.

Consequently, bank lobbyists are keeping the pressure on budget committee leaders Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., and Rep. John R. Kasich, R Ohio.

Still, House Banking staffers are confident that bipartisan efforts will fend off President Clinton's proposal.

"The administration may still be urging fees, but we have a strong, unified opposition," said a member of the House Banking committee staff. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.