Magazine article New Zealand Management

Make Small Great, Not Beautiful

Magazine article New Zealand Management

Make Small Great, Not Beautiful

Article excerpt

Small is not necessarily beautiful. Maybe E F Schumacher was wrong back in 1973.

Sure, New Zealand looks beautiful. Tourists come in millions to stare at the beauty, especially in the South Island. But the beauty they come for is in the landscape, not the smallness.

In fact, tune in to the agonising of politicians, economists and social commentators and smallness sounds like a handicap. Moreover, distance from the big places makes New Zealand look and feel even smaller--as if it is viewed through the wrong end of a telescope.

Often this is compensated for by overexertion. We tell ourselves we "punch above our weight". In some ways that is true: a high Olympic medal count per capita; a prime minister highly regarded by heads of governments of countries with 20 or 100 times our population; an impressive per capita patent count.

But we are small. Hop across the Tasman and discover just how small. The Australian media's radar picks up about as much of this country as they do of Papua New Guinea.

How to manage this invisibility is a constant challenge for politicians.

They might do worse than look inside their own bureaucracy.

The 1988 reforms took 'small is beautiful' into new territory. They fragmented big departments by function: policy, regulation, funding, delivery. The Ministry of Transport and the Ministry of Justice fell below critical mass. The disassembled bits developed their own policy units in competition.

And micro-ministries were created. Among them was the Ministry of Women's Affairs. Its brief was to scan policy for its impact on women and to push for women's needs and aspirations to be integrated into policy--much as the Treasury monitors for fiscal implications.

In opposition, National mused on abolishing it. John Key, however, wants to woo women, especially liberal women who would be displeased by abolition. The ministry has had a stay of execution.

But it remains small, with just 35 fulltime-equivalent staff, a small $41.3 million budget--and a wide scope, including international work. How does it keep up morale in the jungle inhabited by big agencies like the Treasury, the Ministry of Economic Development and the Ministry of Social Development?

Shenagh Gleisner came in as chief executive from KPMG via the State Services Commission in 2004. She is one of the better-regarded public sector CEOs: when Child, Youth and Family was leaderless in 2006, she was drafted in to hold the fort. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.