Magazine article The Wilson Quarterly

The Global Warming Diet

Magazine article The Wilson Quarterly

The Global Warming Diet

Article excerpt

THE SOURCE: "Food-Miles and the Relative Climate Impacts of Food Choices in the United States" by Christopher L. Weber and H. Scott Matthews, in Environmental Science and Technology, May 15, 2008.

WORRIED ABOUT THE ENVIRONMENTAL cost of eating Chilean grapes in January? Eager to help curtail global warming by grilling only locally grown beef?. Then pay more attention to what you eat and less to geography. Surprisingly, write two engineers at Carnegie Mellon University, consumers can do more to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions by shifting family menus one day a week from red meat and dairy products to chicken, fish, or vegetables than they can by buying 100 percent locally grown food.

Christopher L. Weber and H. Scott Matthews found that the delivery of food from producers to grocery stores accounts for only four percent of America's food-related greenhouse-gas emissions. Most of the environmental impact of food is the result of things that happen during the production phase. Transportation as a whole accounts for only 11 percent of food's life cycle emissions, and international air freight only two percent of that.

No matter how it is measured, Weber and Matthews write, "red meat is more greenhouse-gas intensive than all other forms of food," because of the long supply chains of animal feed. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.