Magazine article New Zealand Management

The Dangers of Social Networking Sites

Magazine article New Zealand Management

The Dangers of Social Networking Sites

Article excerpt

Today's workforce is more internet-savvy than ever before, and the internet is seen by this generation as an indispensable tool for almost every aspect of working life. In particular, the use of social networking sites like Facebook or MySpace is on the rise. But users of these sites often forget that Big Brother is watching, especially if you are checking your inbox on company time.

Personal use of the internet by employees has in the past been monitored by employers primarily because it reduces the time employees spend working, and therefore their productivity. Most internet and email policies have a statement about excessive use of the internet for personal reasons being misconduct, and punishable by disciplinary action.

However, policies often do not cover the situations that are now arising--such as employees publishing personal information or photos about themselves, or worse still, their employer, on their Bebo/Facebook/MySpace page. Many employees also have blogs, where they may write racist, sexist, political, or otherwise objectionable comments that may bring the employer's business into disrepute by association.

While there have been no cases (yet) in New Zealand dealing specifically with networking sites and blogs, the courts overseas have upheld sackings for derogatory postings. In a recent example from Canada, an employee in the Alberta Public Service was dismissed when the employer discovered that her blog contained unflattering comments about a number of her co-workers and management, referring to them as "imbeciles", "idiot savants" and "lunatic-in-charge". The Canadian arbitration board deciding the case said that while she had a right to create personal blogs and hold opinions about colleagues, publicly displaying those can have consequences for the employment relationship. The board said that the dismissal was justified.

While the New Zealand Employment Relations Authority is likely to uphold dismissals for offensive or derogatory postings which are clearly linked to the employer, or bring it into disrepute, there will be many borderline situations. It is therefore crucial to have an internet policy which specifically covers what will happen if the employer discovers negative comment posted on a social networking site or blog showing the employee has contravened the employer's policies.

This was highlighted in the very recent decision of Arthur D Riley & Co v Wood (8 October 2008) where the Employment Court said that insofar as the company policy sets the standards the employer expects of staff using the internet, this is relevant in assessing whether an employee's dismissal is justified. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.