Magazine article American Banker

VIEWPOINT: Taking Long-Term Antitrust Potential Seriously

Magazine article American Banker

VIEWPOINT: Taking Long-Term Antitrust Potential Seriously

Article excerpt

Byline: Matthew L. Cantor and Jeffrey I. Shinder

Over the last 12 years, we have spent a great deal of our professional lives prosecuting antitrust cases against Visa and MasterCard.

First, we represented a class of merchants in a case that produced a settlement worth more than $3 billion in cash, as well as injunctive relief that was valued by the courts at $25 billion to $87 billion. This case concerned Visa/MasterCard's "honor all cards" rules that forced merchants to accept Visa/MasterCard debit transactions at inflated prices.

Second, and most recently, we represented Discover Financial Services in its lawsuit against Visa and MasterCard for damages stemming from their rules that precluded banks from issuing Discover Network cards. This case was recently settled for $2.75 billion.

In fighting these complex cases, we have learned a thing or two about payment networks. To put that knowledge to good use, we make two observations that we hope will benefit U.S. financial institutions. At a time when short-term thinking has contributed to the current credit crisis, we hope this advice will resonate, particularly as banks assess the inevitable settlement proposals in the ongoing litigation over their historic interchange setting.

Banks need to take a long-term view of economics. Through Visa and MasterCard, banks have spent hundreds of millions of dollars defending practices that may have been in their short-term best interest but which were ultimately self-defeating. These practices were not only not in banks' long-run best interests but also not in their customers' interests.

Elementary economics shows that marketwide output, and profits, are maximized when resources are allocated in the most efficient way. The Visa and MasterCard rules that we fought against caused markets to perform inefficiently. For example, in a world without the exclusionary rules that prevented banks from issuing Discover or American Express cards, banks could have reached new customers by segmenting their portfolios through the unique attributes associated with the Discover or American Express networks, such as their widely recognized brands.

If they had done so, banks would have increased their profitability and delivered more choices to consumers.

Moreover, in a world where merchants were not forced to accept Visa/MasterCard debit transactions, signature debit interchange would have been priced more competitively - that is, probably at levels comparable with PIN debit rates. Though this would, in the short run, have reduced banks' revenue, the disadvantage would have been outweighed by the benefits of a more efficient PIN debit system.

The efficiency gain also would have put more money in consumers' pockets because merchants typically pass along higher debit interchange rates in the form of higher-priced goods and services. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.