Magazine article Editor & Publisher

Newspapers Make a Killing Selling Obama 'Trinkets' -- Ethically Wrong?

Magazine article Editor & Publisher

Newspapers Make a Killing Selling Obama 'Trinkets' -- Ethically Wrong?

Article excerpt

The media like to portray themselves as paragons of ethical virtue, above reproach or scrutiny by the public or any outside agency. They spend much of their time looking into the houses of those they suspect of wrongdoing, but little time examining of their own shortcomings.

Ombudsmen and reader advocates who are supposed to examine individual media organizations rarely do an adequate job because more often than not they are employed by the very companies whose dealings they are supposed to scrutinize. Who is going to take a chance on making the boss angry and being relegated to a dead-end job, or being jobless, at a time when so many journalists are out of work?

Most media organizations have page and pages of ethical guidelines that reporters and editors are supposed to follow or risk being fired. A strict ban on benefiting financially from the outcome of any story is one of the primary tenets of those guidelines. The intent is to prevent not only a conflict of interest, but any hint of impropriety in the objectivity and fairness of stories that are written about a particular subject. Stories slanted in one direction or another that end up being financially beneficial to the reporter or the parent company are without a doubt among the more serious violations of media ethics.

Yet that is exactly what happened in this election and what has been happening ever since. The reason is simply this: money.

In an era of declining media revenues, loss of newspaper circulation and falling viewership among local TV newscasts, the media will do virtually anything to make a few bucks, even if it means selling their ethical souls.

That first became clear during the run-up to the election, when the media became cheerleaders for Barack Obama. The New York Times was the most blatant of the pro-Obama media crowd, eschewing any hint of objectivity or fairness in its coverage.

But in the weeks following the election, one reason the media wanted Obama to win so badly is that it would be easier to make money off him than John McCain.

As Andrew Malcolm first reported in his blog in the Los Angeles Times, the media are making a financial killing off Obama merchandise. In little more than two weeks, the LA Times raked in $686,000 in sales of cheap Obama trinkets.

A quick stroll through the L.A. Times web site reveals a nice selection of Obamania gear. You can get everything from a $7 newspaper to a $14. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.