Magazine article Insight on the News

Banking on Cuts for Just Rewards

Magazine article Insight on the News

Banking on Cuts for Just Rewards

Article excerpt

Leaders on both sides have been vigorously debating and, aside from death and taxes, something else seems certain this year: Capitol Hill soon will stop hiking and skirt acting on capital-gains reductions.

In a letter to a friend in 1789, Benjamin Franklin wrote that "in this world nothing is certain but death and taxes." But with a balanced-budget amendment to the Constitution killed by Senate Democrats and no clear GOP agenda in sight, capital-gains tax relief may be Congress' last-gasp opportunity to avoid a "do nothing" label. At the opening of the Senate Finance Committee hearing on capital gains in mid-March, Chairman William Roth, a Delaware Republican, repudiated the words of his House colleague, Majority Whip Tom DeLay of Texas, about postponing comprehensive tax cuts. "My answer is: Read my lips, no delay The American people deserve a tax cut now."

In 1913, before the graduated income tax and with the country alarmed about speculators, Congress voted to tax the net gain on the value of every asset when it is sold, including stocks, homes, office equipment or any other asset. But 84 years later a controversy surrounds the tax which some believe has become an unfair burden in the quest for the American Dream.

Bill Sprague is one American who would benefit from a capital-gains tax cut. For Sprague, investment is not a high-stakes speculation in the stock market, it's 40 years of steady toil on his 3,000-acre corn, soybean, beef and hog farm in Union Country, Ky As a member of the board of the American Farm Bureau, he speaks for 4.7 million families when he says it's fundamentally wrong to tax income twice from capital assets. "I don't know any farmers who have bought farmland, buildings, equipment or livestock with untaxed dollars," he told a Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry subcommittee.

Sprague has found receptive ears in Congress. While debate continues about whether comprehensive tax reform will occur this year, many members on both sides of the aisle agree that some form of capital-gains reduction almost is certain. "There is significant bipartisan support for broad-based capital-gains relief," House Ways and Means Chairman Bill Archer tells Insight. "I'm still somewhat optimistic that before this year's out a capital-gains rate reduction will not only pass but be signed into law."

The senior member from Texas, Archer says the conservative "Blue Dog" Democrats in the House have told him they support the idea of a capital-gains tax cut but first want to focus on balancing the budget. Archer says even Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin is willing to talk about a reduction in capital gains, although it is not an administration priority. The conservative Texan cautions that it may be a long process before Congress passes tax relief this year and predicts that any consensus will depend on which form the capital-gains tax cut takes.

During the last three months, senators and congressmen have been adding to the number of capital-gains relief bills. Many Republicans, including freshman New Jersey Rep. Mike Pappas, would like to abolish the capital-gains tax, but most support cutting it in half. Building on a capital-gains tax-cut provision in a 1995 congressional budget proposal, Republican Sens. Orrin Hatch of Utah and Charles Grassley of Iowa and Democratic Sens. Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut and John Breaux of Louisiana have refined their proposals.

Like many Republican bills including Roth's American Family Tax Relief Act, the Hatch proposal would provide individuals with a 50 percent capital-gains reduction and also would give corporations a maximum capital-gains rate of 25 percent, as well as providing enhanced incentives for investments in newly issued stock of small corporations.

Middle-income investors are taxed at 28 percent on their capital assets, while the wealthiest individuals are taxed at 39.6 percent. The Hatch bill would repeal the present law, making the highest effective rate 19. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.