Magazine article The Humanist

David Barton: The Religious Right's Master of Phony History

Magazine article The Humanist

David Barton: The Religious Right's Master of Phony History

Article excerpt

I HAVE BEEN MONITORING the activities of an activist named David Barton for years.

While certainly not as well known as some of the TV or radio preachers, Barton's had a powerful influence over the religious right and, by extension, American culture. If you've ever wondered where people get the idea that the United States was founded as a "Christian nation" or that the Founders were right-wing fundamentalists, I can tell you much of that comes from this man.

From his base in the small town of Aledo, Texas, Barton issues a steady stream of religious right propaganda designed to rewrite U.S. history. His group is the one-word WallBuilders (a name that's ironic considering that he wants to tear down the church-state wall). It was inspired by a passage in he Book of Nehemiah that refers to rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem and restoring the moral foundations of the nation. By uncovering our secret "Christian" history, Barton apparently believes he will restore our nation's moral greatness.

I'm wary of the man because he lacks anything resembling critical thinking skills. His first book, America: To Pray? Or Not to Pray? (yes, he appears to have managed the skill of typing), is a self-published screed demanding the return of state-sponsored prayer in public schools. To make his case, Barton musters up page after page of charts "proving" that since 1962 (the year the Supreme Court struck down official school prayer) SAT scores have plummeted while the rate of teen pregnancies, divorce, and crime have skyrocketed. Apparently, no one ever told him that correlation is not causation. The tome is, to be frank, ridiculous and laughable.

Self-published book number two, The Myth of Separation, is equally bad. Designed to prove that we are a Christian nation, the volume was riddled with quotations from the Founders that turned out to be bogus, as Barton himself later admitted. (He didn't make the stuff up, he just relied on bad sources.) He has since rewritten the book and now calls it Original Intent.

Barton's favorite trick is to cherry pick history, pulling quotes out of context and telling only part of the story. For example, he likes to portray John Adams as a fan of merging religion and government. He never mentions that the deistic Adams rejected belief in the Trinity and the divinity of Jesus. If Adams wanted more religion in government, it sure wasn't Barton's religion.

Mainstream historians have panned Barton's work. The respected scholar Mark Lilla has called The Myth of Separation "schlock history" and a "bizarre pastiche" that relies on "selective quotations out of context to suggest that the framers were inspired believers who thought they were founding a Christian nation. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.