Magazine article American Banker

In Focus: Bankruptcy Reform Bills' Discrepancies Threaten Enactment

Magazine article American Banker

In Focus: Bankruptcy Reform Bills' Discrepancies Threaten Enactment

Article excerpt

The Senate's overwhelming approval last week of consumer bankruptcy reform prompted only muted celebration because Capitol Hill operatives know the real hurdle to enactment remains ahead.

Though House and Senate bills share the same principle that consumers should have to repay part of their debts in bankruptcy if they can afford to do so, their philosophies of determining who should pay differ greatly.

Negotiators must resolve that fundamental disagreement and decide which, if any, of several pro-consumer additions to the Senate bill will be dumped to keep the support of banks and credit card issuers. Time is short, with only two weeks left before Congress is set to adjourn.

The industry favors the House's use of a formula based on income and living expenses to decide whether consumers must repay some unsecured debts in Chapter 13 rather than discharging them in Chapter 7. Under this system, debtors who can afford to cover their living expenses and repay all secured debt and at least 20% of unsecured debt over five years would be automatically barred from Chapter 7.

The Senate approach would require creditors to prove to a judge that the debtor could repay at least 30% of unsecured debt within five years. Unlike the House's approach, the decision requires a court hearing and ultimately relies on judicial discretion.

William P. Binzel, vice president of government relations for MasterCard International, predicted, based on conversations with key lawmakers, that the House approach would be selected because it would be simpler and less expensive to implement.

But the Senate side says it will not surrender quietly. After pledging in a news conference after the vote to work diligently for a compromise, Sen. Charles E. Grassley, R-Iowa, emphasized that the 97-to-1 victory margin in the Senate was more convincing than the 306-to-118 vote by the House in June and that the Clinton administration favors the Senate bill. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.