Magazine article Marketing

Gillette

Magazine article Marketing

Gillette

Article excerpt

The shaving brand's innovation-driven strategy has suffered in the recession, writes Jeremy Lee.

The transgressions of two Gillette brand spokesmen, Thierry Henry and Tiger Woods, proved something of a sideshow for the shaving brand.

While Gillette vowed to stand by Henry, whose handball led to Ireland's failure to reach the World Cup finals, its response to Woods, whose infidelities resulted in a backlash from his other sponsors, was to say it would limit his future use. Of its trinity of spokesmen, only Roger Federer managed to end 2009 escaping any public scandal.

The knock-on effect of the tabloid headlines seemed to sum up what has been a disappointing year for the Procter & Gamble-owned brand.

It suffered a dramatic decline in share for its market-leading Gillette Mach 3 line, and, while cash-conscious consumers might have sought to cut the expense of razor blades or make them last longer, drops for its Fusion Power and Fusion variants against a big increase in share for arch-rival Wilkinson Sword Quattro showed the rest of its portfolio was struggling too. In fact, the only good news came from its Gillette Venus range for women.

Gillette's previous strategy of cannibalisation by launching extensive, and arguably unnecessary, NPD also looks out of kilter with the prevailing mood of austerity.

What should Gillette do next? We asked Jonathan Bottomley, head of planning at BBH London, who works on the Lynx/Axe account, and Greggs customer and marketing director Scott Jefferson, who has previously worked on the Avon and Sensodyne brands.

DIAGNOSIS

Two industry experts suggest how Gillette can sharpen up its act

JONATHAN BOTTOMLEY, HEAD OF PLANNING, BBH LONDON

Gillette has successfully unlocked more value from the razor market for years, moving guys from one razor platform to another at mach speed.

However, its strategy of continuously persuading men to upgrade their razor to a technically better piece of kit has recently been blunted, as a bout of innovation mania has coincided with the recession.

Even the most gadget-obsessed guy is likely to be asking himself whether it's really worth paying more for on-board microchips, precision trimmers and batteries when there are simpler, high-quality alternatives such as Wilkinson Sword's Quattro on offer.

Many of the recent innovations feel more like peripheral gimmicks than necessities, meaning that the brand has failed to create a platform convincing enough to kill off either the competition or its predecessor. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.