Magazine article History Today

Rethinking Otto III-Or Not: Chris Wickham Revisits an Article by J.B. Morrall, First Published in History Today in 1959, on the Strange, Shortlived Emperor Who in the Tenth Century Sought to Rule the Lands We Now Call Germany and Italy

Magazine article History Today

Rethinking Otto III-Or Not: Chris Wickham Revisits an Article by J.B. Morrall, First Published in History Today in 1959, on the Strange, Shortlived Emperor Who in the Tenth Century Sought to Rule the Lands We Now Call Germany and Italy

Article excerpt

J.B. Morrall in 1959 wrote what was for the period a pretty good account of Otto III's unusual but brief career. Why Morrall, who was a political scientist, seized on Otto is not clear, but he caught the fascination of the man and the difficulty historians have had in placing him. They are no more agreed today.

Otto III (983-1002), from a family based in Saxony in northern Germany, was emperor of what we now call Germany and Italy; they had been ruled together since his grand-father Otto I took Italy in 962. Otto III was three at his accession and took up sole rule when still only 14. He went to Rome to be crowned emperor in 996. Like Otto I he took the opportunity to choose a new pope and chose his cousin as Gregory V, the first pope ever from north of the Alps. Otto left Rome again for the north and Gregory was expelled shortly after. Otto returned in anger in 998, re-established Gregory and killed or mutilated his opponents, including the rival pope, John XVI.

There was nothing new in any of this; Otto I had done much the same. But Otto III did not then leave again. Instead, he established himself in Rome semi-permanently in a newly built palace on the traditionally imperial Palatine Hill and spent most of the rest of his short reign there. He established what is called on his official seal from this period a renovatio imperil Romanorum, a 'renewal of the empire of the Romans; surrounding himself with officials with high-sounding names. The Romans of his time were not, however, grateful for this new and unusual political regime. They revolted against him in 1001 and he died of fever in January 1002 aged only 21, when probably planning a renewed attack on the city.

How one should evaluate this isolated and brief attempt to rule Germany and Italy from the far south rather than the far north has divided historians for nearly two centuries. Was Otto a deluded and callow romantic seduced by dreams of classical glory, which made no sense in 1000 and, which (German historians thought in the 19th century) distracted him from his real role, to continue the difficult task of unifying Germany properly? Or was he an exciting political-religious innovator, taking traditions from the classical Romans, Carolingians and Byzantines and making them his own in a new forward-looking fusion only cut short by his early death, as Percy Schramm thought in 19297 J. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.