Magazine article Word Ways

Unsociable Diplomats and Misnamed Wombats: More Funny Bloopers and Barbed Ripostes

Magazine article Word Ways

Unsociable Diplomats and Misnamed Wombats: More Funny Bloopers and Barbed Ripostes

Article excerpt

In a Wall Street Journal forum on terrorism, published on September 9, 2011, a former top government official wrote: "We went to war with Germany in 1941 not because it had attacked Pearl Harbor but because it was dangerous." Does he really think Germany rather than Japan attacked Pearl Harbor? Or is it just a sloppily crafted sentence? Among the comments posted in response to the forum--167 in all--only one reader pointed out the mistake.

The following errors and anomalies are not quite as momentous, but you may find them amusing, as I did. As always, each is paired with an arch retort.

Associated Press, February 6, 2011:

"Two men have been arrested and charged in a shooting at an Ohio fraternity house that killed one student and injured 11 people at a party near Youngstown State University campus, police said Sunday."

* The house is pleading self-defense.

The New York Times, Corrections, February 2, 2011:

"A television review on Tuesday about 'Post Mortem,' a documentary on PBS about lapses in the American system for investigating causes of death, misattributed a quotation from the film and rendered part of it incorrectly. The forensic pathologist Vincent Di Maio--not Marcella Fierro, the retired chief medical examiner of Virginia--said that the work done "varies from excellent to absolutely lousy." He did not say "really, really lousy."

* Whew!

cbsnewyork.com, January 15, 2011:

"In Times Square Saturday, four pairs of competitors are trying to break the Guinness World Record for a handshake from 2009, which is when two people shook for 15 hours and 30 minutes.... They have to meet all of the Guinness rules. These rules include using only one hand for the duration and, if they take a permitted bathroom break, continuing the handshake with a Guinness official observing."

* Good luck with that.

The New York Times, June 10, 2011:

"[The one-woman play] also touches on Ms. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.