Magazine article Anglican Journal

Would the Prince of Peace Ever Counsel Violence? (World Council of Churches' Decade to Overcome Violence)

Magazine article Anglican Journal

Would the Prince of Peace Ever Counsel Violence? (World Council of Churches' Decade to Overcome Violence)

Article excerpt

IT MAY BE inevitable that the beginning of the World Council of Churches' Decade to Overcome Violence should be marked by the question of whether it is ever appropriate to use violence to end violence. The moderator of the WCC's central committee, Catholicos Aram I, posed that question at a recent meeting.

Referring to the situation in Israel he said: "Violence is evil; yet for some, living under conditions of injustice and oppression, where all means of non-violent actions are used up, violence remains an unavoidable alternative, a last resort."

For some, such a position, from a Christian leader, seems absurd. How can we follow the Prince of Peace down the path of violence? How can we resort to the use of lethal force if we are told to "love our enemies." Yet others see the pacifism implied in this response as unrealistic, out of touch with the dreadful realities under which many people live and the lack of options they have in the face of political oppression or military occupation.

This is an old debate that reaches back into the early centuries of the church's existence. At its very beginning, the church was pacifist, believing that resorting to violence was incompatible with the call of the gospel. As the church moved from being a marginal, sectarian group to acceptance as part of the religious landscape of the Roman Empire some argued that the new political freedoms brought with them new responsibilities. For thinkers like Augustine, it was not appropriate to enjoy the benefits of political stability, without showing willingness to share in the costs, including military service.

Augustine's position is a remarkable one for its time for two reasons. First, he condemns the use of violence in self-defence. Second, although he allows the use of violence to defend the interests of others as an expression of love and concern for the victims of injustice and oppression, he sets out conditions under which it is appropriate to refuse to engage in violence and thus disobey the the state. In his day, this was an extraordinarily subversive possibility.

Augustine's conditions form the basis of principles usually referred to as the Just War theory, by which Christians have sought to distinguish conflicts that are justified from those which are not. This distinction has always been easier in theory and with hind-sight. Since 1930, successive Lambeth Conferences have criticized the resort to violence to resolve economic, cultural, political, or religious disputes. However, in 1988, under pressure not to isolate those in South Africa who believed that only armed conflict would end apartheid, the bishops added that the conference, "understands those who, after exhausting all other ways, choose the way of armed struggle as the only way to justice, whilst drawing attention to the dangers and injustices possible in such action itself. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.