Magazine article The Christian Century

Gun Control as a Religious Issue

Magazine article The Christian Century

Gun Control as a Religious Issue

Article excerpt

Of all the controversies that have I followed in the bloody wake of the July 20 shooting rampage in Aurora, Colorado, few have provided such clarifying insight into the moral tensions and contradictions in American culture as the argument over whether gun control is a religious issue.

James Martin, an author and Jesuit priest, was among the first to set out the terms of the debate when he penned a column for America magazine arguing that gun control "is as much of a 'life issue' or a 'pro-life issue'.., as is abortion, euthanasia or the death penalty (all of which I am against), and programs that provide the poor with the same access to basic human needs as the wealthy."

Martin's central point was that abortion opponents spare no effort to try to shut down abortion clinics or to change laws to limit or ban abortions, so clearly believers should be committed to taking practical steps to restrict access to guns.

"Simply praying, 'God, never let this happen again' is insufficient for the person who believes that God gave us the intelligence to bring about lasting change," Martin wrote. "It would be as if one passed a homeless person and said to oneself, 'God, please help that poor man,' when all along you could have helped him yourself."

The debate is as intense today as it has been after every gun massacre, but it hasn't changed the dynamics of the issue for believers or politicians. It may not this time either. Within hours of posting his views about gun control as a religious issue on Facebook, Martin had to shut down comments on the page because of the vitriol his views provoked.

Still, the Jesuit's views were echoed by an array of religious voices and groups who also called on Christians and other believers to advocate for policies to curb gun violence, with some putting the exhortation in an explicitly antiabortion context.

"It's time to say that unregulated availability of assault weapons is clearly antilife," said Sherry Anne Weddell, co-director of the Catherine of Siena Institute in Colorado Springs. "It's time for pro-life people to take a stand."

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Frank Pavone, head of Priests for Life and an antiabortion activist generally associated with the religious right, made a similar point. "Anyone concerned about protecting human life has to be concerned about the misuse of guns, and of anything else that can become a weapon against the innocent," Pavone said in an interview. "It's the same as Mother Teresa's famous quote, 'If we tell a mother she can kill her own child, how can we tell others not to kill each other?'"

There was vigorous counterargument, however, that followed two main tracks. One was to resist any public policy prescriptions and debates as beside the point--or worse, to see them as inappropriate political exploitation of a tragedy. The second was to see the gun control debate as a distraction from a spiritual and theological focus.

Wrote Mark Galli, senior managing editor of Christianity Today, the flagship evangelical magazine, in an essay dated July 23: "We are kidding ourselves if we think we have within our national grasp an educational or psychological or political solution to evil. There is no solution [to] or explanation for evil."

A number of other prominent conservative Christians, like Rep. Louie Gohmert (R., Tex.) and former Arkansas governor and Southern Baptist minister Mike Huckabee, took that view a step further and argued that it wasn't just the mystery of evil but also the nation's self-inflicted spiritual wounds that led to the massacre. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.