Magazine article Information Today

'MLS Strongly Preferred'

Magazine article Information Today

'MLS Strongly Preferred'

Article excerpt

One of my academic colleagues in library land sent out an email. Her message read, "I recently saw an announcement for a library technical assistant position in which an MLS, while not required, was listed as 'strongly preferred.'"

Her message continued: "The duties of the position are clearly of a paraprofessional nature. It seems to me that this announcement, with the MLS 'strongly preferred' as a qualification, is emblematic and symptomatic of a devaluing of our professional degree that is occurring in all types of libraries today. I think it is worthwhile for us to reflect--in library schools, in our local, state and national library organizations, and in our own workplaces--what our professional degree means anymore."

Meanwhile, another academic colleague--one with a couple of decades' worth of experience--told me that the starting salaries for new librarians being hired at her large research institution were getting higher and higher "for people who have a library degree but not a whole lot of experience." She was particularly concerned about who was being hired for library jobs that would logically seem to require specialized knowledge and/or training.


"We have a nuclear collider here," my colleague said. "You'd think they'd want someone (for a science librarian position) who had at least some sort of background in physics." Instead, she said that they settle for the lowest common denominator and spend several years training the person, who then leaves ... and takes his or her newly acquired subject area expertise right out the door.

The Navel-Gazing Question

On the surface, it looks as though we're talking about a couple of different issues here. But if you give it a little thought, you can see how they're both related to the same navel-gazing question that gets asked over and over again in our profession: What, exactly, is the value of an M.L.S. degree? Note that I use the term "M.L.S." in a generic sense. Some of us have M.L.I.S. degrees, for example, and my degree is an M.A. in Library and Information Science.

I'm sure I've written about this issue before in any number of iterations. I'm as prone to navel-gazing as anyone else or maybe more so since I've also worked in journalism, another profession whose practitioners are constantly obsessing over their collective value.

To be perfectly honest, this is as much about perception as it is about anything else. As far as a sizable chunk of the general populace is concerned, anyone who works in a library doing anything at all is a librarian. And this is in spite of the fact that the profession has changed radically since the late 1980s, when I graduated from University of South Florida School of Library and Information Science.

At the time, I remember thinking that a library degree represented job security. I could always walk into a public library or school or the local community college and get a job. I might not get rich, but at least I was employable.

Now? Not so much.

But in spite of the lackluster job market, library school is arguably more popular than ever. And this is why you can even get your master's degree online now. But then, what are you really qualified to do?

For many of us, librarianship is a second career, and we each bring something a little different to the profession. I remember being quite impressed with the diverse backgrounds of many of my library school classmates: professional musician, police officer, automobile assembly-line worker, human resources manager, retired army sergeant, and registered nurse. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.