Magazine article ADWEEK

Celebrities by Sears

Magazine article ADWEEK

Celebrities by Sears

Article excerpt

Used to be the novelty of a famous-name label made the retailer millions. Today, it barely makes the news.

Retailing serves up its share of difficult Lessons. Among them: Sometimes celebrity endorsements work magic, sometimes not. Given all the variables involved, it's tough to make direct comparisons, but the ads on these pages afford a rare opportunity. Both are for Sears, both for in-house clothing Lines, both feature famous females, and both were Hail Mary marketing passes made in the trailing days of a recession. "It's the same story of a broad, mass retailer offering a piece of glamour with high-name recognition," said Chris Raih, managing director of creative agency Zambezi. "And it appears to be a revenue grab in both cases." The key difference: Cheryl Tiegs' clothing Line saved Sears in 1981, a feat that the Kardashian sisters have been unable to achieve today.

Thirty-two years ago, executives at the century-old retailer were struggling to find a way to stop sliding sales in its women's apparel division. Taking a chance on a then-new idea, Sears offered a private-Label deal to Tiegs. While the Minnesota-born model had stirred up the 1978 swimsuit issue of Sports Illustrated, her unlikely knack for blending sex appeal with girt-next-door wholesomeness was attractive to the 700-store chain. According to the company history, "Sears saw great value in the positive image of Tiegs as both an active and attractive woman." And value there was. Cheryl Tiegs generated $100 million in clothing sales.

It's hard to blame Sears for wanting to try the celeb-endorsement thing again, even though some of the chain's subsequent private-Label deals (the one with Arnold Palmer) were more memorable than others (say, the one with Evonne Goolagong)--never mind the fact that the Kardashians obviously run a few speeds hotter than the homespun Tiegs. Raih points out that Sears could at Least be assured of publicity, no small thing for a brand struggling to define itself against cooler, more nimble retailers that weren't around in 1981. "Whatever your personal feelings about the Kardashians, they play broadly," Raih said. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.