Magazine article Strategies: The Journal of Legal Marketing

Implementing Client Feedback Programs despite Internal Resistance

Magazine article Strategies: The Journal of Legal Marketing

Implementing Client Feedback Programs despite Internal Resistance

Article excerpt

"No one loves the messenger who brings bad news." This quotation by Sophocles neatly describes why it is so difficult to gain acceptance for client feedback programs in law firms. Yet, without systematically seeking input from clients, law firms don't always know when they're not hitting the mark. Often, a lawyer or firm will act as if no news from a client is good news, when in fact it could be much more sinister.

Clients don't always fire a lawyer or firm outright. Instead, their dissatisfaction compiles until they have a new matter or case to assign and decide to try someone else rather than compound the dissatisfaction. If the incumbent lawyer is engaged in a long-term matter, he or she will go on working the matter and may continue to think the client is happy and loyal, when in fact the opposite is true. it can be difficult to understand what factors are chipping away at client satisfaction and loyalty without regular client feedback initiatives until it's too late.

On the other hand, client feedback might just as well uncover a client who is highly satisfied, and in those cases, there is a direct correlation between a high level of service and the client's degree of loyalty. Luckily, clients have a predilection to stick with their incumbent firm for many reasons, including the lawyer and team's knowledge of its company and legal history; the efficiencies of reusable work product; personal relationships; proprietary technology connections, such as portals; and many other factors. It takes a while for dissatisfaction to trump these other factors.

How can a law firm generate and sustain client satisfaction and loyalty? First, the firm must understand what drives both satisfaction and loyalty from the client's point of view. This cannot be achieved without systematically asking clients for feedback, which firms can accomplish in myriad ways. The best client feedback programs combine several of the following methods:

* Conduct key client visits by the firm's chairman or managing partner or by the practice group leader in the case of larger firms. Just as the firm is interested in understanding the client's short- and long-term plans, clients are often equally interested in understanding the current and future direction of the firm, which is best communicated by someone in a position of leadership.

* Client interviews conducted by an outside third party are particularly effective when the firm wishes to gain feedback from a fairly large amount of clients in a short time or when feedback is going to be used for strategic planning reasons.

* Informal client visits by the partner managing the relationship with the client are helpful to ensure the right team is supporting the client, to determine how current matters are progressing and to understand the client's potential future needs. This gives the firm a chance to gear up for changing needs and conditions.

* Client interviews conducted by a senior manager or CMO can be useful, as long as the manager understands the substantive issues that the client may raise and also understands that this is not a hard sell situation. The manager must also enjoy a high level of respect and credibility from the lawyers and firm leadership for this to work.

* Client surveys conducted online or via hard copy are good for assessing satisfaction in a quantitative manner. if scores indicate dissatisfaction, in-person follow-up is necessary.

* End-of-matter questionnaires are a good way to capture what impacts client satisfaction regarding a specific case or matter.

No matter what method is chosen, there may be initial internal resistance to asking clients for feedback, especially when that is done via anyone other than the partner in charge of the relationship. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.