Magazine article The Exceptional Parent

The Effects of Legislative Enhancements on the Education of the Deaf

Magazine article The Exceptional Parent

The Effects of Legislative Enhancements on the Education of the Deaf

Article excerpt

As future legislation is enacted, the success of deaf children should not be measured by how closely they emulate their hearing peers, but that they are given an education that will enable them to become successful human beings, not imitations of hearing people.

When examining federal laws that have had significant impact on the education of the deaf child, one can begin with the sweeping educational acts of the 60s, then move to P.L. 94-142 and trace this law's subsequent reincarnations up to the present. It is important that the parents of a deaf child understand how these laws have been misinterpreted and have often led, directly or indirectly, to the least appropriate and most restrictive educational environment for the child.

PL 88-352, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was the first federal legislation that indirectly affected the education of the deaf child. The intent of this law was, of course, desegregation; but for the deaf child it inadvertently ushered in segregation. Without a doubt, this enactment positively impacted the educational rights of hearing minority populations, but the idea of desegregation for a student who is unable to hear English and to fully access a spoken and written language has segregating consequences.

Along with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, PL 89-10, the Elementary and Secondary Act of 1965 which was intended to address educational inequality, the misinterpretation of this law has negatively impacted the education of the child who is deaf by placing him/her in a public school classroom that is often not appropriate, is most restrictive, and not language accessible. It is important to realize that for the deaf child, their language is often of a visible, not an auditory nature.

The Bilingual Education Act of 1967, PL 90-247, was a federal enactment that had the possibility to positively impact the education of the deaf; however, because of the exclusionary misinterpretation of this law, it has been ineffectual in benefitting the deaf child. This act was the first federal legislation regarding minority language speakers (the deaf primarily are users of a visual language). The purpose of this act was to provide school districts with federal funds to establish educational programs for students with limited English speaking ability, and to provide the opportunity to provide bilingual education programs without violating segregation laws. If the federal government had had the foresight and understanding that being deaf is not a disability, but a socio-cultural minority, this law could have been fortuitous for the deaf child.

The next federal legislation that impacted education of the deaf was enacted in 1975 and is known as the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, PL 94-142. The intent of this law was to provide a free, appropriate public education for every child between the ages of three and 21, regardless of how, or how seriously, he/she may be handicapped. Even though the intent of this law was good, the misinterpretation for the deaf child as being placed in an educational environment of mainstreaming in public school classrooms with hearing children has been, for many deaf children, catastrophic. Since the law was enacted in 1975, education of the deaf child has been in a quagmire relative to what is deemed appropriate and least restrictive. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.