Magazine article The Advocate (The national gay & lesbian newsmagazine)

Making Health Care Equality a Reality: The Human Rights Campaign Has Been Evaluating Health Care since 2007, but Will New Obama Administration Regulations Make the Healthcare Equality Index Obsolete?

Magazine article The Advocate (The national gay & lesbian newsmagazine)

Making Health Care Equality a Reality: The Human Rights Campaign Has Been Evaluating Health Care since 2007, but Will New Obama Administration Regulations Make the Healthcare Equality Index Obsolete?

Article excerpt

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

JUST AS JANICE LANGBEHN, PARTNER LISA POND, AND THEIR THREE CHILDREN were about to board a cruise ship in Miami, Pond suffered an aneurysm, collapsed, and was taken to an area trauma center. Though she and Pond had been together for 18 years they were not legally married, and the hospital, which did not view the Lacey, Wash-based couple as "real" partners, prevented Langbehn from being at Pond's bedside while she lay dying.

Charlene Strong of Seattle has a similarly agonizing story. When Kate Fleming, her partner of nine years, was trapped in the basement of their home during a flash flood, Strong risked her own life trying to save her. She then followed the ambulance that rushed Fleming to the hospital but was not allowed in the room until she had managed to track down one of Fleming's out-of-state family members, who gave consent for Strong to be present as Fleming passed away. Also staggering is the case of Erin Vaught, a transgender woman who says she was ridiculed, called a "he-she," and denied treatment altogether at a Muncie, Ind., emergency room, even though she had coughed up a large quantity of blood.

The stakes are rarely higher than they are in hospitals--sometimes a matter of life and death--but medical facilities have no standard practice when it comes to something as fundamental as letting patients determine the person they wish to have at their bedside or to make medical decisions on their behalf. Inhumane or bigoted hospital policies have a disproportionate impact on LGBT patients.

For the past four years the Human Rights Campaign, in conjunction with the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association, has sought to battle the inequities in hospital policies as they affect LGBT people. Each year the HRC publishes the results of a survey in which U.S. health care facilities self-diagnose their ability to provide equitable treatment to lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients and their families as well as LGBT employees.

The most recent Healthcare Equality Index, which was released last June, included data from 116 hospitals and 62 clinics, and yielded the HRC's list of top performers (see sidebar).

Unfortunately, the report illustrates that while more facilities are striving to provide welcoming and competent care for everyone, America's hospital system as a whole falls short in meeting the needs of gay patients. Only a small percentage of participating facilities scored positively in all of the survey's four key measures (patient nondiscrimination, visitation rights, cultural competency training, and employee nondiscrimination), while a large percentage of the facilities--a whopping 70%--failed to include gender identity in their patient nondiscrimination policies.

Fortunately, much has happened since last summer.

"There are few moments in our lives that call for greater compassion and companionship than when a loved one is admitted to the hospital," wrote President Obama to Kathleen Sibelius, secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, in an April 2010 memo that outlined his view of visitation and decision-making rights of LGBT family members. The memo was inspired in part by the sad story of Langbehn and Pond.

Following a period of public review, Health and Human Services acted on the president's wishes, and in January federal regulations went into effect that granted patients more control over their medical decisions. More specifically, all hospitals that accept federal money in the form of Medicare and Medicaid are now required to allow patients to designate who can visit them and who is authorized to make key medical decisions on their behalf, regardless of whether that person is a blood relative or legally recognized spouse. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.